New Marketplace

What Does It Mean to Be a Good Physician Today?

Interview · March 21, 2016

The core characteristics of what it means to be a good physician or a good medical group will never change, according to Larry Casalino, Chief of the Division of Health Policy and Economics at Weill Cornell. At the same time, those characteristics alone are no longer sufficient. Casalino sat down with NEJM Catalyst’s Tom Lee to discuss the need for both the traditional visit-based view of a physician and for incorporating ways to make our population healthier. Read or listen to the interview below.

 

 

Tom Lee: This is Tom Lee for NEJM Catalyst. Today I’m speaking with Larry Casalino of Weill Cornell Medical College, where he’s Chief of the Division of Health Policy and Economics in the Department of Healthcare Policy and Research. Besides being a real expert in health policy, he also has the experience of having been a primary care physician leading a group in the Half Moon Bay area of California. So he has both academic as well as on-the-grounds experience with the topics we’re discussing today.

Larry, if you were coming out of medical school today, I know you would be coming out wanting to be a good physician. You’d want your medical group to be a good medical group. What would it mean in this day and age if you were coming out today, to be a good doctor, to be a leader of a good medical group?

Larry Casalino: I think the core characteristics of what it means to be a good physician will never change, and that means taking responsibility for the patient, really feeling that you are responsible for what happens to your patient, and not pointing fingers at someone else if something goes wrong. I think it’s important to develop and to maintain the necessary skills, so you need to be technically good as a physician and stay that way. And it’s critical, I think, to listen to people, and to be empathetic, and to really care about them.

So I think those have always been the core characteristics of a good physician, a good professional, and those will always be the case. But although I think they’re necessary, I think more is now needed. I don’t think that is sufficient anymore, to be a good physician, or if you’re a medical group, to have physicians like that — not sufficient to make you a good medical group.

I’ll elaborate on that by saying that I think the traditional view of being a physician is, I take care of whatever patient happens to show up in front of me while they’re in front of me, and if I do a good job, I’m a good physician, and if I’m a really good physician I actually get in touch with them with their test results and things like that — talk to them on the phone, or whatever.

So I think that kind of traditional visit-based, “individual patient view of being a physician” is still necessary, but isn’t sufficient. And what we need now, and I’m not saying anything I think people don’t know, is that we need also to think about not just, what do I do with whatever patient happens to show up in front of me while they’re in front of me, but what does my organization do for all the patients for whom we’re responsible, and not just when they happen to show up, but proactively.

So, what do we do to step back and think about, what are the best ways that we can make our population of patients healthier? What do we need to do to do that? And I think that nowadays, to really feel like I’m a really good physician, and my medical group or my hospital or whatever is a really good organization, we need to have both the traditional ways of being a physician, and this new population health/organized-process view of what needs to be done.

Lee: And I would add that in this day and age, it’s not just being excellent as an individual. It’s also conveying to the patient that we are all working together as a team because patients are scared about whether or not teamwork is going on because they know how complicated care is.

Casalino: Let me just add to that, Tom, if you don’t mind. I agree that no matter how excellent you are individually, it just isn’t enough anymore. I mean, we used to think during training and practice — certainly this was the case in the world I lived in — that there were things that went wrong, that they just went wrong, that patients just got blood clots after surgery, people got infections in central lines, and there were a lot of things that happened to people that we almost thought were just kind of like acts of God or this is just the way medical care is, you can’t always have things work out like you’d like. Or you’d have patients with serious chronic illnesses that wouldn’t follow your instructions, wouldn’t take medications properly, whatever, and that was kind of their fault, but I’m a really good physician because technically I’m really good.

And I think now, that’s not enough. I think we need to realize that any bad things that happen to patients — we need to look at why they happened and what can we do, as you say, as a team, to make it so they don’t happen at all, as far as we can do things. So, I think that does require a somewhat different view of what it means to be a physician, and what it means to be a medical group or hospital, really.

Lee: Well, Larry, I know that you can synthesize what it means to be old-school in the new era, as well as anyone can. So I want to thank you for your time today, and I know that we’ll be coming back to you for commentary and recommendations on this issue in the years ahead. Thanks very much.

Casalino: Thanks, Tom. It’s always a pleasure speaking with you.

New Call for Submissions ­to NEJM Catalyst

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

More From New Marketplace
Liljenquist01_pullquote generic drugs

Addressing Generic-Drug Market Failures — The Case for Establishing a Nonprofit Manufacturer

A consortium of hospitals and health plans is establishing a nonprofit generic-drug manufacturer to produce a steady supply of affordable essential drugs and stimulate competition in generic-drug markets.

Shrank02_pullquote IDFS

Effective Consolidation: A Model for Reform Through Payer-Provider Integration

UPMC’s payer-provider partnership integrates real-time data to support improved clinical decision-making and optimizes clinical and financial performance.

Millenson01_pullquote big data analytics SDOH

Big Data on Social Determinants: Improved Health and Unaddressed Privacy Concerns

The use of psychographic data by health systems and health plans could provoke a backlash if not done with patient consent.

Effect of Value-Based Payment Programs on Providers That Serve the Poor

Financial Incentives and Vulnerable Populations — Will Alternative Payment Models Help or Hurt?

Understanding APMs’ potential consequences for vulnerable populations is critical if we wish to maximize benefits and reduce harms.

Example 4-Quadrant Analysis and Price Setting for a Single-Procedure Bundle - Lessons Learned from DRG Implementation

Making Bundled Payments Work: Leveraging the CMS DRG Experience

Given its clout and experience, CMS is uniquely positioned to lead the U.S. health system toward high-value care. Bundled pricing based on real costs, leveraging lessons from DRG implementation, would establish the right types of provider incentives.

Kocher03_pullquote risk-based primary care provider

Opportunities for Risk-Taking Primary Care Providers

Embracing two-sided risk while adopting workflow redesign and reviewing benchmarks is leading to improved clinical and financial outcomes.

The Unrealized Potential of EMRs: Interoperability and the Opportunity for Disruption

NEJM Catalyst hosted clinical and business leaders, along with the originator of “disruptive innovation,” to consider the user frustration, high cost, and lack of interoperability of electronic medical records.

Steven Seltzer Andrew Menard Clayton Christensen Edward Prewitt Electronic Medical Records Roundtable Head Shots

The Unrealized Potential of EMRs: Why They Fall Short and the Unexpected Source of a Solution

NEJM Catalyst hosted clinical and business leaders, along with the originator of “disruptive innovation,” to consider the user frustration, high cost, and lack of interoperability of electronic medical records.

Robert Gavin head shot

Amazon and CVS: Short-Lived Unicorns in Health Care, or Healers of the “Tapeworm”?

Will Amazon–Berkshire Hathaway–JP Morgan and CVS-Aetna change the health care game? To one health care employer purchaser, these announcements feel a lot like Groundhog Day.

Fiona Scott Morton head shot

We Can’t Spend All Our Money on Health Care

We have to think about how much we want to spend on health according to how much it’s worth to us at the margin.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Value Based Care

164 Articles

Effective Consolidation: A Model for Reform…

UPMC’s payer-provider partnership integrates real-time data to support improved clinical decision-making and optimizes clinical and…

Addressing Generic-Drug Market Failures — The…

A consortium of hospitals and health plans is establishing a nonprofit generic-drug manufacturer to produce…

Addressing Generic-Drug Market Failures — The…

A consortium of hospitals and health plans is establishing a nonprofit generic-drug manufacturer to produce…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now