New Marketplace

What Are Bundled Payments?

Article · February 28, 2018

Bundled payments represent one form of alternative payment models (APMs) that are designed to move toward value-based care by incentivizing providers to advance coordination and efficiency of care while also improving quality and outcomes at lower costs. With bundled payments, the total allowable acute and/or post-acute expenditures (target price) for an episode of care are predetermined. Participant providers share in any losses or savings that result from the difference between this target price and actual costs.

Bundled payments, also known as episode payment models (EPMs), require participant providers to assume risk, as they must cover costs that go above the target price for an episode of care including those that arise from complications and hospital readmissions. On the upside, providers share in the savings if they keep costs below the target price while maintaining quality standards. Bundled payments are showing significant promise in improving care quality while at the same time bringing costs down.

 Episode of Care Definition

An episode of care involves the entire care continuum for a single condition or medical event, such as joint replacement or labor and delivery, during a fixed period. It includes all acute and post-acute care delivered by hospitals, physicians, skilled nursing facilities, and other providers participating in a care pathway. Other episodes of care commonly involved in bundled payments are:

  • Myocardial Infarction
  • UTI
  • Pacemaker
  • Congestive Heart Failure
  • Stroke
  • Sepsis

As these examples illustrate, some episodes of care represent a higher risk than others. Additionally, patients also represent different levels of risk based on age, behavioral factors, and comorbidities. For these reasons, bundles can be adjusted to reward providers who assume more risk.

Bundled Payment Models: Retrospective and Prospective Payment Systems

There are two basic types of bundled payment models: retrospective payment systems and prospective payment systems. In a retrospective payment system, payers retain a fee-for-service (FFS) arrangement and continue to compensate providers directly. But they also track total costs against the predetermined target price. If costs exceed the target price, then the payer reduces payments accordingly. If costs are lower than the target price, then providers share in the consequent savings.

In a prospective model, payers make a single lump-sum payment to a convener who then distributes payment to the various providers involved in the episode of care. As with the retrospective model, providers share in any losses or gains based on the predetermined target price.

CMS Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI)

First introduced at the Texas Heart Institute in 1984, bundled payments rose to prominence with the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). This legislation led to the formation of the CMS Innovation Center which created the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) Initiative. Four bundled payment models were developed and piloted through this program between 2013-2017:

Four payment models under CMS’s BPCI Initiative

Four payment models under CMS’s BPCI Initiative Click To Enlarge.

Medicare Bundled Payments 2018: CMS BPCI Advanced

At the end of November last year, the Trump administration canceled hip fracture and cardiac care bundles that were mandatory under the Obama administration. To reduce the burden on rural hospitals, they also significantly decreased the number of geographic locations from 67 to 34 where participation in the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) payment bundle was required.

These policies left healthcare leaders wondering about the future of bundled payments. But in January 2018, CMS confirmed its commitment to bundles when it announced BPCI Advanced. This new CMS bundled payment model includes twenty-nine inpatient and three outpatient episodes of care. Participation in the program is voluntary and involves a single retrospective bundled payment for a 90-day clinical episode duration. BPCI Advanced qualifies as an Advanced APM under MACRA’s Quality Payment Program to further entice physicians to participate with the additional Advanced APM monetary incentives.

Bundled Payment Success Strategies

One area where bundled payment models are showing great promise is in joint replacement procedures. Several providers demonstrated cost savings, particularly in post-acute care costs, under CMS’s CJR payment bundle. According to a JAMA study published in February 2017, CJR saved U.S. taxpayers $5577 or 20.8% per joint replacement care episode for 3942 patients.

Providers who have piloted bundled payment programs are having success in other areas as well. Here we outline nine strategies that have been gleaned from the experiences of early participants:

  1. Physician Leadership
    Leverage the clinical expertise and experience of physicians throughout the entire care journey. Surgeons, hospitalists, and other specialists should stay proactive in decisions about patient recovery even after they have left the hospital.
  2. Care Navigator or Coordinator
    Assign navigators to patients to assist them with post-discharge care in areas such as medication and care instructions. While many organizations fill this role with nurses, others are tapping non-licensed personnel to liaise with the care team and to help with non-clinical post-discharge activities such as filling prescriptions and getting to follow-up appointments. This additional support is proving cost and care effectively.
  3. Consensus Building
    Develop consistent care pathways by gaining consensus from all involved providers regarding metrics, guidelines, and protocols as well as a system of governance that monitors and ensures compliance. Establishing on-going partnerships between acute and post-acute providers builds trust and reduces clinical and financial variations.
  4. Early Mobility
    Get patients moving as early as possible after an acute care event. Mobility has long been shown to speed up recovery. It also reduces the length of stay at skilled nursing and inpatient physical therapy facilities and sometimes prevents the need altogether.
  5. Mine Existing Data
    Use historical data to understand variation in patient care journeys and their subsequent outcomes to identify opportunities. What worked well? Where can inefficiencies be eliminated? Also, use predictive analytics to understand higher-risk patients who have comorbidities, sometimes referred to as “bundle breakers.”
  6. Classify Episodes of Care Based on Risk
    Group episodes of care according to risk when negotiating target prices. For example, elective hip replacement patients represent lower risk than those with hip fractures, so bundles should be priced accordingly.
  7. Technical Infrastructure
    Develop internal data systems as well as appropriate provider collaboration and information sharing tools. Or consider hiring third-party administrators such as tech companies or outside bundle conveners to do it for you. Having access to data across care teams and throughout the span of time for an episode of care offers unprecedented learning opportunities.
  8. Reduce the Use of Skilled Nursing and Inpatient Physical Therapy Facilities
    When appropriate, send patients home by engaging the family in care. For patients with higher care needs, develop a strategy that prioritizes patient mobility and strives to reduce time spent in care facilities. 
  9. Prepare Patients for Success
    Encourage patients to quit smoking, attend to their comorbidities such as diabetes, and address their social needs. Proactively educate patients and their families about what to expect and how to care for themselves post-discharge.

Bundled Payments: A Permanent Fixture in Health Care

With the promise of the early BPCI bundles, the government’s recently renewed commitment to these APMs, and the collective knowledge gained from early pilots, more and more health care leaders are exploring bundled payments’ potential for reward. In fact, according to McKesson and ORC International, payers are forecasting bundled payments to account for 17% of payments by 2021. What’s more, large ­employers who, along with their workers, are being crushed by high insurance costs, are directly negotiating bundle pricing. These are telling indicators that bundled payments will remain a key APM in value-based care strategies.

New call for submissions ­to NEJM Catalyst

Now inviting longform articles

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

More From New Marketplace
Elements of a Sustainable Complex Care Management Contract

Sustainable Financing for Complex Care Management Is Critical to a Value-Driven Health Care System

Care management should be payer-agnostic at its core.

Comparison of Certain Model Features in Blue Cross NC Blue Premier vs Next-Generation ACO Model vs BCBSMA Alternative Quality Contract

Engineering a Rapid Shift to Value-Based Payment in North Carolina: Goals and Challenges for a Commercial ACO Program

We believe North Carolina can be a model for the nation.

Small Molecule Drugs Facing Generic Competition - Orphan and Non-Orphan Drugs - Orphan Drug Act

It’s Time to Reform the Orphan Drug Act

Three proposals for improving the law to reflect 21st-century drug development practices.

Three-Part Pricing of PCSK9 Inhibitors

A New Model for Pricing Drugs of Uncertain Efficacy

Are we paying too much for new drugs before we know how well they work? This innovative pricing model proposes postponing major rewards until efficacy is established — which could help both patients and payers while still paying back investments on the most effective drugs.

what does quality measurement in health care mean

Buzz Survey Report: Addressing the Problems of Quality Measurement

An independent NEJM Catalyst report sponsored by University of Utah Health on patient involvement in quality measurement.

Average HOOS and Average KOOS for patients undergoing hip and knee replacement at CJRI

Building a “Hospital-within-Hospital” Model for Joint Replacements

The Connecticut Joint Replacement Institute has demonstrated that formerly competing independent providers can unite on a common vision to yield drastic improvements in quality, safety, and costs.

Discharge Rates and Follow-Up Internval Dashboard for One Provider at MGH Dermatology

A Successful Pilot to Improve Access by Adjusting Discharge and Follow-Up Rates

Actionable data and modest financial incentives can help motivate clinicians to adjust their behavior around scheduling follow-up appointments.

Cautious Optimism That Value-Based Reimbursement Will Become Primary Revenue Model

Survey Snapshot: What Would Accelerate the Adoption of Value-Based Care?

NEJM Catalyst Insights Council members weigh in on the barriers and path forward to value-based health care.

Strongwater08_pullquote primary care value proposition and disruptive innovation

The Evolution of Primary Care: Embracing Innovation While Protecting the Core Value

Primary care must leverage disruptive innovations to ensure that patients receive first-access, comprehensive, coordinated, continuous care that is woven into a seamlessly integrated system.

Berns01_pullquote nephrologists dialysis facility joint venture conflicts of interest

Dialysis-Facility Joint-Venture Ownership — Hidden Conflicts of Interest

Despite potential benefits, joint ventures between nephrologists and dialysis companies raise legal and ethical concerns because of participants’ conflicts of interest and lack of transparency.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Value Based Care

199 Articles

Curbing Health Care Spending: The Provider’s…

Health care costs have historically grown at about 2% faster than income in the United…

Medicare and Medicaid

122 Articles

A Collaborative Model to Expand Medicaid…

How managing the benefit coverage expansion for the treatment of HCV in New Mexico was…

Vertical Integration and Bold Experimentation

Four points on improving value in health care via vertical integration and aggressive experimentation.

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now