New Marketplace

We Are All Patients, We Are All Consumers

Article · December 28, 2015

Key Takeaways

Competing visions of a reformed U.S. health care system have delivered, in each iteration for two decades, a blueprint for some version of a market-based solution. The Affordable Care Act with its emphasis on insurance “marketplaces” (a.k.a., exchanges) has set the country firmly on the path to a new paradigm of health care commerce. The idea was that empowered consumers, armed with better tools and transparent information about quality and cost, would make informed purchasing decisions based on personal preferences. And the new health care marketplace would function like . . . a marketplace.

Language has evolved to reflect this market orientation. “Consumers” increasingly has replaced “patients,” and the terms often are used interchangeably, to the dismay of many care providers. Treating care delivery as just another commodity bought by “consumers” and sold by “producers” profoundly misrepresents the nature of our work. It discounts the values of our profession and fails to recognize the ethical constraints and special obligations of clinicians — which are very different from those of a salesperson or stockbroker.

But, of course, defining people as either patients or consumers is a false dichotomy.

In the new marketplace, we are both consumers and patients. We each face a dizzying (and growing) array of options for insurance plans, provider networks, and institutions of care, all with their own financial implications. We are consumers when we make rational decisions about which health insurance to purchase, about tolerating financial risk, and whether the price of discretionary services represents value. And we will all be patients at some point — ill, frightened, in pain — bringing to that experience a very different set of values and needs that must be respected and attended to.

Historically, we assigned responsibility for “consumer” needs to health insurers and payers, and responsibility for “patient” needs to the medical profession. Friction and mutual animosity resulted — with carriers castigating physicians for reckless indifference to costs, and physicians demonizing insurers for insensitivity to patient needs and the unique nature of the physician-patient relationship.

What the new health care marketplace requires of all participants is shared responsibility for the needs and values we bring to our experiences as both consumers and patients. Organizations must respond to consumer needs for affordability, for accountability (on cost, quality, and transparency), and for reducing the complexity that is proliferating in the new marketplace. And we all must respond to patient needs for compassionate care that recognizes the whole person. The true test of emerging models of care delivery and financing will be: Are they are fit for these purposes? Are they up to the task?

New Call for Submissions ­to NEJM Catalyst

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

More From New Marketplace
Robert Gavin head shot

Amazon and CVS: Short-Lived Unicorns in Health Care, or Healers of the “Tapeworm”?

Will Amazon–Berkshire Hathaway–JP Morgan and CVS-Aetna change the health care game? To one health care employer purchaser, these announcements feel a lot like Groundhog Day.

Fiona Scott Morton head shot

We Can’t Spend All Our Money on Health Care

We have to think about how much we want to spend on health according to how much it’s worth to us at the margin.

Simplified Chain of Production for Primary Care Services Generating Retail Prescriptions. Solid arrows indicate contractual relationships or ownership, and the dashed arrow indicates referral for prescription.

Does CVS–Aetna Spell the End of Business as Usual?

What might one of the largest mergers in history mean for the health care delivery system?

Lack of Incentive Is Top Barrier to Implementing Value-Based Payment

Survey Snapshot: Payer-Provider Alignment Is Difficult Even for Integrated Organizations

NEJM Catalyst Insights Council members say stronger incentives and better use of analytics could improve alignment.

Kaplan04_pullquote Time to Sink Two Canoe Payment Models Argument

Time to Sink the Two-Canoe Argument

Although the transition from fee-for-service to quality-based payment can leave physicians feeling trapped “with a foot in two canoes” while straddling the two payment methods, there are compelling ethical, professional, and business reasons against rationalizing continued support of fee-for-service medicine.

Mostashari01_pullquote - Medicare Advantage Holds the Key to Reforming the ACO Program

Medicare Advantage Holds the Key to Reforming the ACO Program

Value-based care continues to be the emphasis of federal policymakers, as well as many providers. Aligning Medicare Advantage with ACOs would boost both programs.

Physician Group Practices BPCI Classic Success and Looking Ahead to BPCI Advanced Bundled Payments

Physician Group Practices: Succeeding in Bundled Payments

Physician groups are demonstrating their ability to deliver care in new and innovative ways as part of the nationwide effort to transform health care delivery through value-based payment models. The physician experience and perspective is invaluable and should remain an important component of any shift to value-based care.

How Aligned Are Payers and Providers in Working Together to Achieve Value-Based Care

New Marketplace Survey: Payers and Providers Remain Far Apart

Health care stakeholders are not aligned in important goals and in large part are not working together to achieve value-based care, according to the NEJM Catalyst Insights Council. They are waiting on government regulators to change the payment model — including, possibly, single-payer health care.

Comparison of Select Characteristics of the Sample and Shared Savings Program - MMSP ACO - Physician-Led ACOs

Do Independent Physician-Led ACOs Have a Future?

While some of these smaller organizations are succeeding, they do face numerous challenges, and there is a need for both regulatory change as well as greater sharing of peer-based resources and best practices.

Disruption of Innovative Mergers in Health Care Industry - BDO graphic

Innovative Mergers Will Disrupt Health Care

The NEJM Catalyst Insights Council expects outside players to have a major impact on the industry over the next three years.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

We Can’t Spend All Our Money…

We have to think about how much we want to spend on health according to…

Primary Care ACO Models: Way of…

Evidence shows that primary care–led, risk-bearing, ACO-like practices and independent physician group models generate more…

Amazon and CVS: Short-Lived Unicorns in…

Will Amazon–Berkshire Hathaway–JP Morgan and CVS-Aetna change the health care game? To one health care…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now