New Marketplace I

We Are All Patients, We Are All Consumers

Article · December 28, 2015

Key Takeaways

Competing visions of a reformed U.S. health care system have delivered, in each iteration for two decades, a blueprint for some version of a market-based solution. The Affordable Care Act with its emphasis on insurance “marketplaces” (a.k.a., exchanges) has set the country firmly on the path to a new paradigm of health care commerce. The idea was that empowered consumers, armed with better tools and transparent information about quality and cost, would make informed purchasing decisions based on personal preferences. And the new health care marketplace would function like . . . a marketplace.

Language has evolved to reflect this market orientation. “Consumers” increasingly has replaced “patients,” and the terms often are used interchangeably, to the dismay of many care providers. Treating care delivery as just another commodity bought by “consumers” and sold by “producers” profoundly misrepresents the nature of our work. It discounts the values of our profession and fails to recognize the ethical constraints and special obligations of clinicians — which are very different from those of a salesperson or stockbroker.

But, of course, defining people as either patients or consumers is a false dichotomy.

In the new marketplace, we are both consumers and patients. We each face a dizzying (and growing) array of options for insurance plans, provider networks, and institutions of care, all with their own financial implications. We are consumers when we make rational decisions about which health insurance to purchase, about tolerating financial risk, and whether the price of discretionary services represents value. And we will all be patients at some point — ill, frightened, in pain — bringing to that experience a very different set of values and needs that must be respected and attended to.

Historically, we assigned responsibility for “consumer” needs to health insurers and payers, and responsibility for “patient” needs to the medical profession. Friction and mutual animosity resulted — with carriers castigating physicians for reckless indifference to costs, and physicians demonizing insurers for insensitivity to patient needs and the unique nature of the physician-patient relationship.

What the new health care marketplace requires of all participants is shared responsibility for the needs and values we bring to our experiences as both consumers and patients. Organizations must respond to consumer needs for affordability, for accountability (on cost, quality, and transparency), and for reducing the complexity that is proliferating in the new marketplace. And we all must respond to patient needs for compassionate care that recognizes the whole person. The true test of emerging models of care delivery and financing will be: Are they are fit for these purposes? Are they up to the task?

New Call for Submissions ­to NEJM Catalyst


A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

More From New Marketplace I

Predicting the Future — Big Data, Machine Learning, and Clinical Medicine

By now, it’s almost old news: big data will transform medicine. It’s essential to remember, however, that data by themselves are useless.

Caring for Older Adults in a Value-Based Model

Using patient stratification and more primary care visits, Chicago-based Oak Street Health aims to reduce hospitalizations.

Caring for High-Need, High-Cost Patients

Five foundations committed to improving U.S. care for complex patients outline promising program models and keys to success.

How 30 Percent Became the “Tipping Point”

Received wisdom for meaningful change in health care payment and delivery system reform.

Two-Year Costs and Quality in the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative

Midway through this four-year intervention, participating practices report progress in transforming the delivery of primary care. But savings and improvements in the quality of care or patient experience are lagging.

The Coming Battle over Shared Savings — Primary Care Physicians versus Specialists

The way physicians are organized and reimbursed in the United States is undergoing a once-in-a-generation transformation from a fee-for-service system to alternative payment models. PCPs are well positioned economically and strategically, but specialists must adapt.

How a Pediatric ACO Coordinates Care for Children with Disabilities

Ohio-based Partners for Kids is charting new territory in care coordination for a high-need population.

My Favorite Slide: Transitions in Health Insurance Coverage Type Are the Norm

Age and income play a role in both short- and long-term fluctuations.

Mixed Early Performance of Medicare Accountable Care Organizations

The earliest participants in MSSP contracts reduced Medicare spending, but the second cohort did not. Meanwhile, some quality measures improved among MSSP participants, while others were unchanged.

Why UnitedHealthcare’s Withdrawal Is Not the Main Concern for Exchanges

United’s announcement will affect some local markets, but the giant insurer has not been a major player in health insurance exchanges. And exchanges are only one part of the complex payment reforms under way.


A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »


Reframing the Conversation on Drug Pricing

We can’t afford for current trends to continue. There is only one solution.

Bundled Payments

36 Articles

Economic Investment and the Journey to…

Early evidence suggests that value-based payment and care delivery can transform our health care system,…

Value Based Care

127 Articles

Jumping into Value-Based Reimbursement with Two…

What payers would like to see when it comes to engagement in value-based reimbursement and…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now