Care Redesign
Clip
Winners, Losers, and Staying in the Game (09:47)

When it comes to care redesign, with any change, there are winners and losers. What’s the difference between the winners and the losers? Thomas Graf, National Director of Population Health Management at The Chartis Group, sat down with CMS’s Patrick Conway and François de Brantes of the Health Care Incentives Improvement Institute to discuss how to get into — and stay — in the winner’s group.

According to De Brantes, it’s not about the organization or the physicians — it’s about the patients. “As long as what we’re getting are really great patient outcomes, does it matter?” he asks.

“We’ve seen the organizations with a culture of transformation are often more successful. However, we’ve seen that organizations who didn’t have that culture can build it, with the right incentives,” Conway says.

But, he explains that when it comes to balancing “middle-of-the-road folks” with “the laggards,” it will probably come down to a different set of interventions, including some realizing that their current model of operation — which isn’t as focused on the patient and desired outcomes — is not the model that’s going to succeed.

De Brantes, however, doesn’t see the laggards as any less motivated to deliver good care as anyone else. “I think what they are prizing is autonomy,” he says. “This tendency to start with, well, if you’re not in some big integrated group that we’re going to shove a bunch of people at, then you’re in the game. That’s not true,” he says, offering Bas Bloem’s ParkinsonNet as an example.

“There’s no fundamental reason why, with good exchange of clinical data and a community, that you can’t have a number of primary care physicians working with a pulmonologist, a cardiologist, all of whom can have independent practices,” de Brantes says. “If I can assemble that network of excellence because I have access to it and I know who’s there and they’re working together, and their information is linked together, then why not?”

Conway agrees. “We’re actually seeing this,” he says. “People thought with the various ACO models and bundles, the big integrated systems would always be the winners. It’s not true. So, when we look at the performance, it really is those cultural organizational factors: we’ve got small physician-led that are incredibly successful, we’ve got urban that are successful, rural that are successful, all regions of the country that are successful across these models, so actually I agree.”

It’s not the form, he says, stressing that they’re not trying to dictate form, but rather a culture of improvement and change. Some organizations already have this, and some will need help getting there.

“We’re trying to design an array of incentives that will work for the various organizations and clinicians that exist,” he adds.

From the NEJM Catalyst event Care Redesign: Creating the Future of Care Delivery at Kaiser Permanente Center for Total Health, September 30, 2015.

More From Care Redesign
Mapping a Technology Strategy for Bundled Payment Care Using a Value-Driven Framework

Harnessing Emerging Information Technology for Bundled Payment Care Using a Value-Driven Framework

A four-part framework developed by physicians at Partners HealthCare provides a stepwise process for assessing and integrating technologies to effectively use data through a continuous patient experience.

UCLA Health CKD Risk Stratification and Management

Proactively Catching the Declining Patient

A coordinated effort by UCLA leaders to identify a high-cost population with chronic kidney disease and to modify care processes and personnel has led to improved health and reduced utilization.

Telehealth and remote monitoring are little used and ineffective for chronic disease care

Survey Snapshot: Treating Chronic Disease Proactively

Though survey respondents don’t indicate strong use of telehealth and remote monitoring, NEJM Catalyst Insights Council members discuss the ways they’re using these tools to monitor chronic disease, with good results.

Platforming Health Care Operations - Consumer-Driven Health Care - Business-Minded Optimizations

Platforming Health Care to Transform Care Delivery

Health care leaders need to focus less on ownership and control of the delivery process, and more on outcomes, cost efficiency, and customer experience.

Shah05_ integrated systems innovation pullquote

Build vs. Buy: What Should Health Systems Do?

The consolidation craze continues, but vertical integration has yet to demonstrate real progress toward the Triple Aim. Health care leaders would do well to consider innovative approaches that are working in other industries, including the tech-enabled full stack model.

Diagram Illustrating the COPD Care Pathway at Allegheny General Hospital

End-to-End Care for COPD Patients that Improves Outcomes and Lowers Costs

Allegheny General Hospital created a comprehensive solution for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that led to improved clinical outcomes, reduced hospital admissions and readmissions, and a resultant decrease in the total cost of care.

David Blumenthal and Bob Galvin head shots

Ripe for Disruption: Why and How Big Players in the Private Sector Are Taking on Health Care

For big tech companies like Amazon, Apple, and Google, the health care sector looks ripe for disruption. Two executives working in different parts of the health care ecosystem discuss what this means for patients and doctors, including the positives and unintended consequences.

Top challenges facing chronic disease management care - insufficient time and care coordination

Care Redesign Survey: To Improve Chronic Disease Care, Change the Payment Model

Many health care organizations are reasonably effective in treating chronic diseases, but they are limited from doing better by fee-for-service payment, which remains the predominant payment model in the United States. This report serves as a snapshot in time, showing the intent of health care providers to be proactive in treating chronic disease, but limitations in their ability to address population health.

Nirav Shah head shot Stanford - AI in medicine and team care

What AI Means for Doctors and Doctoring

Physicians must hone the “four Cs” — critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and creativity — when leveraging AI as a new partner in their care teams.

End of Life EOL Palliative Care in the ED for Patients with Advanced Cancer - Process Map - MD Anderson Cancer Center

Patient-Centered Care at the End of Life in the ED

How MD Anderson Cancer Center is improving end-of-life care in an unlikely place: the emergency department.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Design Thinking

20 Articles

Taxonomy of the Patient Voice

While health care pursues the important trend of putting patients at the center of care,…

How Artificial Intelligence Is Changing Health…

The development of intelligent machines holds great promise for making health care delivery more accurate,…

Proactively Catching the Declining Patient

A coordinated effort by UCLA leaders to identify a high-cost population with chronic kidney disease…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now