New Marketplace
Clip
Room for Small, Independent Practices? (02:30)

There is plenty of room for small independent practices, says Harvard health policy expert and internist Michael McWilliams — and too much emphasis on downside risk. “I don’t know what that really gets us. It requires scale and some degree of consolidation,” he says. Evidence shows that the most effective payment model in terms of savings thus far is the Medicare Shared Savings Program, which is essentially devoid of downside risk. “With the right regulations in place, the right models, there is no reason why a smaller practice can’t be in a one-sided contract and make inroads.”

Griffin Myers, Chief Medical Officer for Oak Street Health, somewhat disagrees, pointing to the problem with romanticizing small independent practices. “[When] we say that medicine is so hard and it’s technical and it’s like rocket science, and it requires all this training, but then at the same time, I can do it and I can have a family member be my accountant and still do it — that doesn’t make sense to me,” he says. “It’s very hard to do something really well meaningfully, consistently, if it’s hard, and do it by yourself without a team.” Small practices don’t necessarily have the infrastructure or resources to measure “all of the things that we know matter.”

It depends on what we mean by small, adds McWilliams. The literature suggests that after a dozen or so physicians, practices have plenty of room for scale without hospital integration, as well as the capabilities for measurement and taking on risk.

From the NEJM Catalyst event Navigating Payment Reform for Providers, Payers, and Pharma, held at Harvard Business School, November 2, 2017.

More From New Marketplace
Three-Part Pricing of PCSK9 Inhibitors

A New Model for Pricing Drugs of Uncertain Efficacy

Are we paying too much for new drugs before we know how well they work? This innovative pricing model proposes postponing major rewards until efficacy is established — which could help both patients and payers while still paying back investments on the most effective drugs.

what does quality measurement in health care mean

Buzz Survey Report: Addressing the Problems of Quality Measurement

An independent NEJM Catalyst report sponsored by University of Utah Health on patient involvement in quality measurement.

Average HOOS and Average KOOS for patients undergoing hip and knee replacement at CJRI

Building a “Hospital-within-Hospital” Model for Joint Replacements

The Connecticut Joint Replacement Institute has demonstrated that formerly competing independent providers can unite on a common vision to yield drastic improvements in quality, safety, and costs.

Discharge Rates and Follow-Up Internval Dashboard for One Provider at MGH Dermatology

A Successful Pilot to Improve Access by Adjusting Discharge and Follow-Up Rates

Actionable data and modest financial incentives can help motivate clinicians to adjust their behavior around scheduling follow-up appointments.

Cautious Optimism That Value-Based Reimbursement Will Become Primary Revenue Model

Survey Snapshot: What Would Accelerate the Adoption of Value-Based Care?

NEJM Catalyst Insights Council members weigh in on the barriers and path forward to value-based health care.

Strongwater08_pullquote primary care value proposition and disruptive innovation

The Evolution of Primary Care: Embracing Innovation While Protecting the Core Value

Primary care must leverage disruptive innovations to ensure that patients receive first-access, comprehensive, coordinated, continuous care that is woven into a seamlessly integrated system.

Berns01_pullquote nephrologists dialysis facility joint venture conflicts of interest

Dialysis-Facility Joint-Venture Ownership — Hidden Conflicts of Interest

Despite potential benefits, joint ventures between nephrologists and dialysis companies raise legal and ethical concerns because of participants’ conflicts of interest and lack of transparency.

Fee-for-Service Continues to Account for the Majority of Revenue

New Marketplace Survey: Transitioning Payment Models: Fee-for-Service to Value-Based Care

In a survey of the NEJM Catalyst Insights Council sponsored by Optum, respondents express enthusiasm for value-based care but have conflicting opinions about just how far along that path they should go.

Sample Report Comparing Individual Patient-Reported Outcome Measures with FORCE-TJR National Norms

The Essential Role of Patient-Centered Registries in an Era of Electronic Health Records

Smartly designed patient-centered registries capture longitudinal data to augment EHRs and enhance quality improvement, policy, and research efforts.

Murray02_pullquote surgical care bundled payments accountable care organizations

Surgical Value — Beyond Bundled Payments

The surgeon has a crucial role in defining value for patients in a population — and not just when that patient is in need of the surgeon’s knife.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Value Based Care

194 Articles

A New Model for Pricing Drugs…

Are we paying too much for new drugs before we know how well they work?…

Prescription for an Ailing U.S. Health…

Three components for treating the unhealthy, uncompetitive U.S. health care market — beginning with a…

Prescription for an Ailing U.S. Health…

Three components for treating the unhealthy, uncompetitive U.S. health care market — beginning with a…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now