Care Redesign
Talk
Physician Incentives: Importance of the Why (10:28)

“Incentives are there to try to change behavior, to try to move things along,” says John Jenrette, Executive Vice President for Cedars-Sinai Medical Network, during his talk on physician incentives and on aligning incentives for other health care providers — whether allied health professionals, pharmacists, case managers, nurses, or “the incredible teams that make the work we do shine and move forward.”

“We’re hopeful that the behavioral changes that we’re initiating or stimulating are going to move health care the direction that we think it needs to go in the future, in this value-based direction,” he says.

The Experience Equation

When talking about aligning incentives, we generally look at the value equation of quality over cost. Next is the experience component, an extremely important dimension for patients, who are health care’s consumers. “Some people don’t like to think of patients as consumers, but they are, and they’re going to continue to be in more and more ways as we move forward,” Jenrette says.

“Equally important,” he adds, “is the experience for our providers, because honestly, if we’re going to move behavior and place incentives appropriately, we have to have healthy physicians, and we have to have physicians who have joy in their practice. We know we have a critical and national problem with burnout. I want to highlight that experience part of the equation that is really important when we think about our incentives, and what we tend to put in motion.”

Importance of the Why

“Today, the word that I want you to walk away with is the single word ‘why,’” Jenrette says. “Why is everything. We’ve heard a lot about different incentives, programs, and advancement, but it doesn’t mean anything unless we answer the why. Why is everything we do as people. The why is the passion, the effort. The sustainability of anything we do is wrapped into the why.”

Jenrette cites Simon Sinek’s Golden Circle theory of how great leaders inspire action, in which why is the center, and only following that why can we look at what and how.

Before digging deeper into applying the why to physician incentives, Jenrette describes his 30 varied years of experience in incentives, working with physicians in independent practices and associations, small group practices, resident programs, and the broad foundation employed model at Cedars-Sinai.

The recipient of metrics and outcomes pushed across his desk during his 20 years as a family physician and geriatrician, Jenrette was often a naysayer, asking, “What are you trying to do? What are you loading on my plate? Why is this important? Why should I care?”

“It comes back to those pieces,” he says.

As a physician leader, Jenrette struggled with the financial part of physician incentives. “What’s enough: 5%, 10%, 15%? What makes a difference?” he asks. Often, we say, “How many times can we split that dollar into smaller and smaller pieces and put more and more on the plate until I don’t care what you’re telling me? I can’t pay attention; it’s not worth my time and effort.”

Jenrette has worked on aligning incentives in a number of different financial models, ranging from fee-for-service environments to shared savings programs and full and partial capitation. He has found capitation to be the strongest and best-aligned financial incentive for population health, to take accountability for our populations.

Four Tenets of Physician Incentives

All that work has led Jenrette to four tenets of physician incentives and behaviors:

  1. Follow the money. “Physicians like money and financial incentives, yes, but they’re not at the core, at all. They aren’t,” he says. “They maybe have this kind of incremental impact if you can put them in the right direction, but I truly believe that if physicians are compensated appropriately for the work they’re doing, the incentives become that icing on the cake, that top performance, the things that we want to pay attention to, want to try to focus on, and reward physicians for that type of behavior.”
  2. Produce meaningful data. “That data has to be accurate, it has to be reliable, it has to be meaningful,” says Jenrette. “If you have walked into a room with a bunch of physicians with data, and they begin to poke thousands of holes into it, you walk out of the room with your tail between your legs, completely discredited, and you will spend so much energy trying to get back there, and even have another conversation. The reliability and meaningfulness of the data and how that applies is important to the why I take care of patients and do the work that I do.”
  3. Involve physicians. “Physicians want to be a part of the process. They want to be in the conversation. They’re smart people. They want to help guide that and direct it, and make sure the data can be meaningful and helpful to their practices and the work that they do. It’s a very important component.”
  4. Ask why. Jenrette stresses that this fourth tenet is the most important of all. “It goes to the core of why we are physicians, in taking care of our patients, in taking care of families, in creating great outcomes and seeing people live healthy and happy. That’s why we become physicians, and why we need to continue to focus in that direction.”

“Sometimes the why feels like it should be easy to do, but it’s not always simple, and there’s a certain energy to describe that,” Jenrette explains. For primary care physicians, it might be easy to see the why in hemoglobin A1c controls, in making sure patients are getting the appropriate preventive services — that becomes important to physicians, who believe their patients will benefit.

An additional why in our current value base is affordability: “Why is health care imploding under the fee-for-service model? Why does it cost too much in medicine? What part do we play as physicians in the orders, in how we direct our patients, in how they are treated and what happens?” And the most critical affordability-related why: “Why are our patients suffering with their deductibles, their copays, and their coinsurances, and maybe not even being able to get their pharmaceuticals to complete the treatment plans, that we, as physicians, want them to complete and be a part of?”

“There are ways to move physicians in that direction,” Jenrette says. “When I look at what we do from here, the first thing I’ve learned is that I need to take time to develop relationships with physicians. I need to develop trust. I need to convey the why. And then, once we do that, you can begin to move into the how and the what. And then physicians are ready to look at the dashboards to help you move them forward. It is more effective and more efficient, and the physicians can help you drive that direction.”

Simply walking into a physician’s office with a fancy dashboard and telling the physician that doing X is in their best interest does not work.

“I leave you with that message of always thinking about doing and talking about the why,” says Jenrette. “I can guarantee you that you can move physicians then into the how and the what and begin to change health care.”

From the NEJM Catalyst event Provider-Driven Data Analytics to Improve Outcomes, held at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, January 31, 2019.

More From Care Redesign
Diagram Illustrating the COPD Care Pathway at Allegheny General Hospital

End-to-End Care for COPD Patients that Improves Outcomes and Lowers Costs

Allegheny General Hospital created a comprehensive solution for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that led to improved clinical outcomes, reduced hospital admissions and readmissions, and a resultant decrease in the total cost of care.

David Blumenthal and Bob Galvin head shots

Ripe for Disruption: Why and How Big Players in the Private Sector Are Taking on Health Care

For big tech companies like Amazon, Apple, and Google, the health care sector looks ripe for disruption. Two executives working in different parts of the health care ecosystem discuss what this means for patients and doctors, including the positives and unintended consequences.

Top challenges facing chronic disease management care - insufficient time and care coordination

Care Redesign Survey: To Improve Chronic Disease Care, Change the Payment Model

Many health care organizations are reasonably effective in treating chronic diseases, but they are limited from doing better by fee-for-service payment, which remains the predominant payment model in the United States. This report serves as a snapshot in time, showing the intent of health care providers to be proactive in treating chronic disease, but limitations in their ability to address population health.

Nirav Shah head shot Stanford - AI in medicine and team care

What AI Means for Doctors and Doctoring

Physicians must hone the “four Cs” — critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and creativity — when leveraging AI as a new partner in their care teams.

End of Life EOL Palliative Care in the ED for Patients with Advanced Cancer - Process Map - MD Anderson Cancer Center

Patient-Centered Care at the End of Life in the ED

How MD Anderson Cancer Center is improving end-of-life care in an unlikely place: the emergency department.

Home-Based Cardiac Rehab - An Overview from Kaiser Permanente Southern California

Saving Lives with Virtual Cardiac Rehabilitation

Collaboration and innovation can improve the performance of cardiac rehabilitation.

Murali01_pullquote Home Recovery Care patient satisfaction

No Place Like Home: Bringing Inpatient Care to the Patient

Providing home-based acute care improves patient satisfaction and care quality while reducing costs.

Rating the Raters - Strengths and Weaknesses Assessment of the Four Public Hospital Quality Rating Systems - 2a

Rating the Raters: An Evaluation of Publicly Reported Hospital Quality Rating Systems

Some promising innovation is taking place among organizations that rate hospital performance, but major systemic change is needed in the field to ensure access to meaningful comparisons through better data and relevant metrics, and to establish integrated oversight through robust audits and peer review.

McKee01_pullquote - the need for coordinated care IPUs for Parkinson's disease

Creating “One-Stop Shop” Care for Parkinson’s

Integrated Practice Units (IPUs) can revolutionize the care of specialty disease conditions, and Parkinson’s disease is a good place to start.

Good Shepherd culturally competent hospice care home visit to the widow of a recently deceased patient

Strangers No More: Culturally Competent Add-On Programs for Diverse Seniors

Creating specialized culturally competent programs to improve patient satisfaction and address the unique health care needs of older immigrants.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Design Thinking

19 Articles

Handcrafting the Patient Experience

Health care organizations can take cues from consumer-facing companies like Airbnb to creatively insert convenience…

Ripe for Disruption: Why and How…

For big tech companies like Amazon, Apple, and Google, the health care sector looks ripe…

Care Redesign Survey: To Improve Chronic…

Many health care organizations are reasonably effective in treating chronic diseases, but they are limited…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now