Patient Engagement
Talk
Knocking Down Barriers to Behavior Change (09:23)

“To help people change behavior, we can think about either pushing them harder or lowering barriers to make it easier,” says Kevin Volpp, Patient Engagement Theme Leader for NEJM Catalyst and founding Director of Penn Medicine’s Leonard Davis Institute Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics. “My philosophy is, we should start by lowering barriers whenever possible.”

Lowering barriers to enable behavior change is more sustainable and takes friction out of the system, and it can be done through a variety of complementary strategies. Volpp highlights seven of these:

  • Changing defaults
  • Simplifying complicated processes
  • Reducing out-of-pocket costs
  • Using technology in supportive ways
  • Raising taxes on unhealthy items
  • Using social support
  • Making it fun

“If we want these programs to be engaging, if we want participation rates to be high, it can’t feel onerous to participate,” he says.

Volpp shares several real-world examples of lowering barriers. In the first, he describes the work of Penn colleague Mitesh Patel on generic medication prescribing. Generic prescribing rates at Penn Medicine were low. Patel’s team found that, inadvertently, brands had been set up as the default — so they changed that default.

“What happened overnight was pretty dramatic,” says Volpp. “Two and a half years later, these effects have been sustained; this has saved our health system about $32 million. The key was to make the path of least resistance the easiest path for providers, the one that aligned with the desired path.” It’s not that providers were opposed to prescribing generics. They simply did not have the time to search for them on a long list of medications.

This and other choice architecture projects like it show real opportunity to impact health care delivery in a big way through small, systematic changes.

Another barrier is the health plan. These plans typically have so many incentives built in that they make it difficult for consumers to know what the cost of care will be and what the underlying incentives are. People also have trouble understanding coinsurance and deductibles; copayments are easier to understand. “We have a veritable alphabet soup where you can think about a guide to benefits that might be 70 or 80 pages long and all of these different incentives at play, which, of course, inherently leads to a lot of confusion,” says Volpp.

A team led by economist and social and decision scientist George Loewenstein worked with Humana to design a new health plan called Humana Simplicity. Its design is simple in three ways:

  1. Only copayments — no other cost-sharing mechanisms
  2. A 2-page benefits guide
  3. Everything collapsed into 1 of 7 price categories
Larger Employer Subsidies Increase Weight Watchers Participation and Behavior Change

American Journal of Health Promotion, 2016. Click To Enlarge.

Another opportunity to knock down barriers to behavior change is to lower the cost for people who participate health programs like Weight Watchers. In a landmark trial involving 23,000 employees of two large companies, researchers studied how much participation rates would change as employers lowered the cost of Weight Watchers to employees through subsidies.

“You might imagine that you get higher participation rates but people drop out at higher rates, or they lose less weight,” says Volpp. However, providing 100% subsidy roughly doubled the rate of participation, and 80% subsidy increased it by about 60 to 70%. Most importantly, there was no trade-off between higher enrollment rates and weight loss.

Another health success is the reduction in U.S. smoking rates, where the primary driver — “probably the most important driver” — has been raising taxes. Multiple studies show that a 10% increase in taxes leads to roughly a 4% reduction in smoking rates, notes Volpp. “These reductions are even larger among young people because they have less discretionary income, and that’s very important in terms of deterring people from starting smoking in the first place.”

In early April 2018, the Kentucky legislature passed a bill doubling the state’s tobacco tax. “That a state that historically was so important in terms of tobacco production chose to do this really highlights the health and economic benefits to the citizens of the state in raising tobacco taxes,” says Volpp.

“Another interesting and exciting opportunity comes with technology,” says Volpp. A proliferation of new technologies makes it easier for people to monitor and engage with their health. “But it’s very important to recognize that although the capabilities of these technologies are considerable, many people, after given one of these devices, let it sit on a shelf. Once the novelty wears off, it’s no longer so exciting,” Volpp reminds us. “We have to think about, how do we couple these technologies with social science engagement strategies that enable much higher participation rates on an ongoing basis as well improvements in outcomes?”

One example is the first behavioral intervention study, led by Mitesh Patel, in the Framingham Heart cohort. “We took advantage of the multiple family members who were part of that cohort to design a social incentive system of gamification that utilized a number of behavioral economic insights,” Volpp explains. The team provided each family with points at the beginning of the game and set easy-to-attain goals. They chose a member of each family at random every day, and if that person did not meet their step goals they would lose points — leveraging loss aversion and anticipated regret.

“The punchline here is the grand prize: If by the end of this 12-week contest you were at the highest levels of status, you would win the grand prize of a coffee mug,” he says. Despite the lack of monetary value, the people who met their daily step goals in the intervention group climbed to about 50% from 30% in the control group — an effect similar in magnitude to what financial incentive studies have shown.

“These types of approaches can be used to make participation in health improvement initiative much more fun, more engaging, and thereby more successful,” says Volpp.

From the NEJM Catalyst event Patient Behavior Change: Building Blocks for Success, held at Duke University, April 4, 2018.

More From Patient Engagement
Ghafur01_pullquote -digital health health care consumer patient experience

Engaging Patients Using Digital Technology — Learning from Other Industries

Providers can benefit patients and disrupt health care by learning from the experience of other industries.

Mission Hospital Virtual Sitter - Drawing of the Virtual Bed Zone and Rails

Reducing Inpatient Falls and Injury Rates by Integrating New Technology with Workflow Redesign

How Mission Hospital scaled a virtual sitter pilot and reduced unassisted falls by 44% and fall-related injuries by 40%.

Health Care Providers Should Incentivize Patients

Survey Snapshot: Patient Financial Incentives — There Are No Quick Fixes

The NEJM Catalyst Insights Council agrees that while financial incentives are a common strategy to engage patients in healthy behaviors, they are not necessarily effective.

Support of Family and Friends Is More Effective Than Clinician Support in Realizing Health Goals - From the Patient Engagement Insights Report: Why No Single Health Incentive Works.

Patient Engagement Survey: Why No Single Health Incentive Works

Initiatives to improve patient engagement come in a variety of forms. While insurers, employers, and health care providers are all involved in using financial incentives and penalties for engagement efforts, improvement in health outcomes has been elusive. Achieving that ultimate goal will usually require a combination of financial and social approaches.

Health Systems Attending the Nudge Units in Health Care Symposium - Penn Medicine

Key Insights on Launching a Nudge Unit within a Health Care System

Leaders are finding that making higher-value choices easier through subtle changes to choice architecture can have an outsized impact on medical decision-making.

Barriers to Providing an Oustanding Patient Experience

Buzz Survey Report: Patient Experience

An independent NEJM Catalyst report sponsored by University of Utah Health on barriers to achieving an excellent patient experience.

The Patient Engagement Capacity Framework

The Patient Engagement Capacity Model: What Factors Determine a Patient’s Ability to Engage?

Patient engagement assessments often don’t dig deep enough to identify why patients don’t participate in their own health care. We present a new model to help providers pinpoint the reasons for lack of engagement and address them more effectively.

Organizational Mindset Is the Biggest Barrier to Engaging Patients as Consumers

Survey Snapshot: The Patient-Physician Relationship Is Key

Both parties involved in a consumer-facing transaction have access to important information about the product or service — but this isn’t the case with health care.

What High-Need, High-Cost Patients Say About How to Reduce High Utilization of ED and Inpatient Services

High-Need, High-Cost Patients Offer Solutions for Improving Their Care and Reducing Costs

More home health care and after-hours clinics, telemedicine, and home delivery of medications are among top solutions.

Top Physician Pain Points Identified by Chronic Patients

Unmet Needs: Hearing the Challenges of Chronic Patients with Artificial Intelligence

With natural language processing and machine learning, researchers are identifying patient emotional and medical needs that are not being met by clinicians and patient advocacy groups.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Angel Robot and a New Smart…

The Jingde Experiment’s Angel Robot illustrates how continuous, closed-loop learning symbiosis between doctor, AI, and…

Creating “One-Stop Shop” Care for Parkinson’s

Integrated Practice Units (IPUs) can revolutionize the care of specialty disease conditions, and Parkinson’s disease…

Patient-Centered Care

269 Articles

No Place Like Home: Bringing Inpatient…

Providing home-based acute care improves patient satisfaction and care quality while reducing costs.

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now