New Marketplace
Clip
Much Ado About Nothing Over Payment Reform? (05:00)

In their talks during the NEJM Catalyst event “Navigating Payment Reform for Providers, Payers, and Pharma,” both Michael McWilliams and Griffin Myers state that a certain amount of necessary payment reform might just happen on its own if we let things play out.

“Is our concern with payment reform maybe a bit of a much ado about nothing?” asks Robert Huckman during the event’s second panel discussion. “Should we let the system play its course? Or do we need to just give maybe more subtle nudges than we’re doing?”

“I believe that we’re doing too much in payment reform,” answers McWilliams. “There are too many horses out there, and we can’t have a horse race because they’re all knocking into each other.” He references the debate over bundling versus global payment as an example.

“We need to be careful about what we mean by payment reform and let a model run its course for a while to see where that takes us,” he says. “I tend to think that the global budget model, with a primary care–based risk-bearing entity, is the horse to ride and see where it takes us for a while.”

That said, the presence of disturbing trends like rapid consolidation — will any independent, risk-bearing primary care groups be left? — means that the system could use some help. “Getting the market structure right so that these payment models can really work as they should, that’s the key,” says McWilliams. He suggests the implementation of complementary policies, along with site-neutral payments and/or reforming the 340B Drug Discount Program — and reforming financial incentives that underlie the impetus for consolidation.

Myers answers Huckman’s questions from a different perspective — as someone who builds care teams rather than recommends policies. “You can’t expect policymakers to create policies for groups like Oak Street Health,” he says. “There are 60 million Medicare-eligibles; we take care of 30,000-something folks.” According to Myers, no public policy change of the past 20 years has affected Oak Street Health, with the exception of Medicare Advantage and dual integration programs.

“We’re just going to keep working along, we’re going to try to take care of as many people as we can, and do the best job we can,” Myers says. He explains that Oak Street does not make money by cutting out waste and spends the same on Medicare Part B that any other group would — but spends it differently, with savings gained from Part A. “That for us is the ultimate quality metric: people staying out of the hospital,” he says. “That’s the quality metric that happens to pay for what we do.”

He recommends that policymakers help where the majority are struggling and says he’s fine with “anything that improves the application of evidence-based, equitable, accountable care.”

From the NEJM Catalyst event Navigating Payment Reform for Providers, Payers, and Pharma, held at Harvard Business School, November 2, 2017.

More From New Marketplace
Effect of Value-Based Payment Programs on Providers That Serve the Poor

Financial Incentives and Vulnerable Populations — Will Alternative Payment Models Help or Hurt?

Understanding APMs’ potential consequences for vulnerable populations is critical if we wish to maximize benefits and reduce harms.

Example 4-Quadrant Analysis and Price Setting for a Single-Procedure Bundle - Lessons Learned from DRG Implementation

Making Bundled Payments Work: Leveraging the CMS DRG Experience

Given its clout and experience, CMS is uniquely positioned to lead the U.S. health system toward high-value care. Bundled pricing based on real costs, leveraging lessons from DRG implementation, would establish the right types of provider incentives.

Kocher03_pullquote risk-based primary care provider

Opportunities for Risk-Taking Primary Care Providers

Embracing two-sided risk while adopting workflow redesign and reviewing benchmarks is leading to improved clinical and financial outcomes.

The Unrealized Potential of EMRs: Interoperability and the Opportunity for Disruption

NEJM Catalyst hosted clinical and business leaders, along with the originator of “disruptive innovation,” to consider the user frustration, high cost, and lack of interoperability of electronic medical records.

Steven Seltzer Andrew Menard Clayton Christensen Edward Prewitt Electronic Medical Records Roundtable Head Shots

The Unrealized Potential of EMRs: Why They Fall Short and the Unexpected Source of a Solution

NEJM Catalyst hosted clinical and business leaders, along with the originator of “disruptive innovation,” to consider the user frustration, high cost, and lack of interoperability of electronic medical records.

Robert Gavin head shot

Amazon and CVS: Short-Lived Unicorns in Health Care, or Healers of the “Tapeworm”?

Will Amazon–Berkshire Hathaway–JP Morgan and CVS-Aetna change the health care game? To one health care employer purchaser, these announcements feel a lot like Groundhog Day.

Fiona Scott Morton head shot

We Can’t Spend All Our Money on Health Care

We have to think about how much we want to spend on health according to how much it’s worth to us at the margin.

Simplified Chain of Production for Primary Care Services Generating Retail Prescriptions. Solid arrows indicate contractual relationships or ownership, and the dashed arrow indicates referral for prescription.

Does CVS–Aetna Spell the End of Business as Usual?

What might one of the largest mergers in history mean for the health care delivery system?

Lack of Incentive Is Top Barrier to Implementing Value-Based Payment

Survey Snapshot: Payer-Provider Alignment Is Difficult Even for Integrated Organizations

NEJM Catalyst Insights Council members say stronger incentives and better use of analytics could improve alignment.

Kaplan04_pullquote Time to Sink Two Canoe Payment Models Argument

Time to Sink the Two-Canoe Argument

Although the transition from fee-for-service to quality-based payment can leave physicians feeling trapped “with a foot in two canoes” while straddling the two payment methods, there are compelling ethical, professional, and business reasons against rationalizing continued support of fee-for-service medicine.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

The Health System Crisis: A Call…

To overcome current failures within our health systems, we need to improve interprofessional education and…

Financial Incentives and Vulnerable Populations —…

Understanding APMs’ potential consequences for vulnerable populations is critical if we wish to maximize benefits…

Change the Model → Change the…

If we’re going to change the health care payment model, do we need to change…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now