New Marketplace
Clip
Why Employers Drag Feet on Value-Based Insurance (04:04)

Lynn Garbee, Senior Director of Reimbursement and Collaborative Care at Cigna HealthCare, would like to see employers jump into the value-based insurance reimbursement world with two feet and collaborate with payers in creating a healthy workforce. So why are employers hesitating? What do employers value and want to invest in when it comes to value-based insurance and health care payment plans in general?

“We’re at a point now where there’s a give and take,” says David Lansky, President and CEO of the Pacific Business Group on Health. “I would like to think of it as a co-evolution that we have to undertake, where the constraints and the requirements of employers are shared with payers.” Employers want payers to back up their claims for which networks and services work by sharing credible, evidence-based innovation in both cost savings, quality improvement, and outcomes. In other words: transparency. Many employers are skeptical when plans say, “We’ve got this new program, this new network, this new centers of excellence program” without offering evidence to share with employees that these new arrangements are better, safer, higher-quality care.

What about limited and narrow networks? Harvard health care economist Leemore Dafny points to research on state health insurance marketplaces showing that narrow networks are associated with much lower premiums, and that consumers are electing to purchase these plans. “Yet employers are really dragging their feet,” she says.

Employers sponsored benefits before the Affordable Care Act because they wanted to get the right employees, and with the labor market tightening, they’re much less interested in creating benefit designs that cause friction, replies Bob Galvin, Equity Healthcare’s CEO. Additionally, employees don’t understand narrow networks in that they don’t understand why employers think one doctor is better than another.

“The other thing is that we’ve been a victim, in a sense, of our own success,” says Galvin, “which is that health care costs have been very flat over the past few years.” Costs have only gone up 1 or 2% for employers, which means that C-suite decision makers would rather focus their company’s money on other things. “If the labor market were wide open and health care costs were going up at 10%, you would get much more updated.”

“I’m disappointed to hear that executives are not concerned, because guess how they’re making those premiums not go up so much? They’re turfing it over to us [the employee/consumer],” says Dafny.

Galvin agrees, noting that it’s just part of the nature of where health care fits into the company. “It’s one of the flaws of employer-sponsored insurance. It is very difficult to get executives who are manufacturing airline parts or whatever to really understand this. They look at the costs. They want to make sure they can get labor. And if that’s okay, they want to run their companies.”

From the NEJM Catalyst event Navigating Payment Reform for Providers, Payers, and Pharma, held at Harvard Business School, November 2, 2017.

More From New Marketplace
Examples of Stages of AI Technology Development and Diffusion

How Artificial Intelligence Is Changing Health Care Delivery

The development of intelligent machines holds great promise for making health care delivery more accurate, efficient, and accessible, but challenges remain for incorporating AI technology into clinical and administrative settings.

Recommendations to Resolve Information Asymmetry at the Strategic Level

Information Asymmetry: The Untapped Value of the Patient

The knowledge and preferences that patients could — and should — share with clinicians would restore balance to point-of-care interactions, leading to better outcomes and enhanced value.

Key Components for Health Care Systems to Address Patient Affordability

The Next Frontier in Reducing Costs of Care: Patient Affordability

To create meaningful point-of-care guidance so that patients can make informed medical and financial decisions, health system leaders and policymakers can develop interventions to address four major components of a proposed patient affordability scale.

Direct-to-Consumer Telemedicine Is the Biggest Coming Threat to Traditional Health Care Organizations

Survey Snapshot: Mega-Mergers and Telemedicine Accelerate Convenient Care Growth

NEJM Catalyst Insights Council members detail how providers are looking to direct-to-consumer telemedicine and partnerships to meet the differing needs of their patient populations.

Opelka01_pullquote - ACS IPU team-based surgical care bundles playbook

Developing a Playbook for IPU-based Surgical Care and New Payment Models

The complexity associated with most surgery lends itself to the integrated practice unit structure, with its focus on the care team and value-based payment.

Convenient Care Has Been Good Overall for the Health Care Industry

New Marketplace Survey: Convenient Care — Opportunity, Threat, or Both?

A survey of the NEJM Catalyst Insights Council shows conflicting views about both the value of convenient care and what respondents’ organizations should do.

Payer-Provider Partnerships Produce Better Quality Outcomes 3 - community health plan - physician partnership

New Research Shows How Payer-Provider Partnerships Can Accelerate Adoption of Evidence-Based Care

Five best practices that are replicable and scalable are facilitating improved clinical and financial outcomes today.

30-Day Mortality Rates at Non-Teaching and Major Teaching Hospitals 2013-2014 - value-based care at academic medical centers

What Value-Based Payment Means for Academic Medical Centers

Academic medical centers must become as dedicated to advancing operational and clinical efficiency as they have been to advancing the science of medicine.

Medicare Compared to Private Spending Cumulative Growth 2009-2019 - traditional Medicare coverage

Redesigning Medicare to Work for Everyone

A proposal to improve the Medicare benefit package.

Pronovost04_pullquote payer interoperability data exchange

Promoting Interoperability: Roles for Commercial Payers

Interoperability is a business imperative for enhancing value in health care, and providers and payers must collaboratively meet the demands for data exchange.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Platforming Health Care to Transform Care…

Health care leaders need to focus less on ownership and control of the delivery process,…

From the Commonwealth to Obamacare: Reflections…

The former Executive Director of the Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector — a model for the…

Build vs. Buy: What Should Health…

The consolidation craze continues, but vertical integration has yet to demonstrate real progress toward the…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now