New Marketplace
Clip
Why Employers Drag Feet on Value-Based Insurance (04:04)

Lynn Garbee, Senior Director of Reimbursement and Collaborative Care at Cigna HealthCare, would like to see employers jump into the value-based insurance reimbursement world with two feet and collaborate with payers in creating a healthy workforce. So why are employers hesitating? What do employers value and want to invest in when it comes to value-based insurance and health care payment plans in general?

“We’re at a point now where there’s a give and take,” says David Lansky, President and CEO of the Pacific Business Group on Health. “I would like to think of it as a co-evolution that we have to undertake, where the constraints and the requirements of employers are shared with payers.” Employers want payers to back up their claims for which networks and services work by sharing credible, evidence-based innovation in both cost savings, quality improvement, and outcomes. In other words: transparency. Many employers are skeptical when plans say, “We’ve got this new program, this new network, this new centers of excellence program” without offering evidence to share with employees that these new arrangements are better, safer, higher-quality care.

What about limited and narrow networks? Harvard health care economist Leemore Dafny points to research on state health insurance marketplaces showing that narrow networks are associated with much lower premiums, and that consumers are electing to purchase these plans. “Yet employers are really dragging their feet,” she says.

Employers sponsored benefits before the Affordable Care Act because they wanted to get the right employees, and with the labor market tightening, they’re much less interested in creating benefit designs that cause friction, replies Bob Galvin, Equity Healthcare’s CEO. Additionally, employees don’t understand narrow networks in that they don’t understand why employers think one doctor is better than another.

“The other thing is that we’ve been a victim, in a sense, of our own success,” says Galvin, “which is that health care costs have been very flat over the past few years.” Costs have only gone up 1 or 2% for employers, which means that C-suite decision makers would rather focus their company’s money on other things. “If the labor market were wide open and health care costs were going up at 10%, you would get much more updated.”

“I’m disappointed to hear that executives are not concerned, because guess how they’re making those premiums not go up so much? They’re turfing it over to us [the employee/consumer],” says Dafny.

Galvin agrees, noting that it’s just part of the nature of where health care fits into the company. “It’s one of the flaws of employer-sponsored insurance. It is very difficult to get executives who are manufacturing airline parts or whatever to really understand this. They look at the costs. They want to make sure they can get labor. And if that’s okay, they want to run their companies.”

From the NEJM Catalyst event Navigating Payment Reform for Providers, Payers, and Pharma, held at Harvard Business School, November 2, 2017.

More From New Marketplace
Strongwater08_pullquote primary care value proposition and disruptive innovation

The Evolution of Primary Care: Embracing Innovation While Protecting the Core Value

Primary care must leverage disruptive innovations to ensure that patients receive first-access, comprehensive, coordinated, continuous care that is woven into a seamlessly integrated system.

Berns01_pullquote nephrologists dialysis facility joint venture conflicts of interest

Dialysis-Facility Joint-Venture Ownership — Hidden Conflicts of Interest

Despite potential benefits, joint ventures between nephrologists and dialysis companies raise legal and ethical concerns because of participants’ conflicts of interest and lack of transparency.

Fee-for-Service Continues to Account for the Majority of Revenue

New Marketplace Survey: Transitioning Payment Models: Fee-for-Service to Value-Based Care

In a survey of the NEJM Catalyst Insights Council sponsored by Optum, respondents express enthusiasm for value-based care but have conflicting opinions about just how far along that path they should go.

Sample Report Comparing Individual Patient-Reported Outcome Measures with FORCE-TJR National Norms

The Essential Role of Patient-Centered Registries in an Era of Electronic Health Records

Smartly designed patient-centered registries capture longitudinal data to augment EHRs and enhance quality improvement, policy, and research efforts.

Murray02_pullquote surgical care bundled payments accountable care organizations

Surgical Value — Beyond Bundled Payments

The surgeon has a crucial role in defining value for patients in a population — and not just when that patient is in need of the surgeon’s knife.

Comparison Between Traditional and Proposed Health Reimbursement Plan for Primary Care Outcomes Model Across Five Key Domains

Payment Designed for People: Introducing the Primary Care Outcomes Model

A care and payment model that engages primary care physicians in an aligned model built on trust and value could result in better patient care at lower costs.

Figure 1. Differential Changes in Total Medicare Spending for Patients in Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), According to the Type of ACO, Year of Entry, and Number of Years of Participation.

Medicare Spending after 3 Years of the Medicare Shared Savings Program

After 3 years of the MSSP, participation in shared-savings contracts by physician groups was associated with savings for Medicare that grew over the study period, whereas hospital-integrated ACOs did not produce savings (on average) during the same period.

Reason and Potential Cost Changes for Patients with Treament Recommendation Changes During MD Anderson Cancer Center Multidisciplinary Team Meetings

Great Minds Don’t Always Think Alike

How multidisciplinary team meetings improve cancer care.

Mechanic02_pullquote self-insured employers

Self-Insured Employers — The Payment-Reform Wild Card

Without more private-sector leadership, U.S. health care will remain stuck in a fee-for-service system for the foreseeable future.

Washington State Health Care Authority Center of Excellence joint replacement elements and outcomes of program produces strong patient experience scores

Improving Care by Redesigning Payment

A state-run center of excellence uses benefit design to improve outcomes while controlling cost.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Value Based Care

190 Articles

The Evolution of Primary Care: Embracing…

Primary care must leverage disruptive innovations to ensure that patients receive first-access, comprehensive, coordinated, continuous…

Dialysis-Facility Joint-Venture Ownership — Hidden Conflicts…

Despite potential benefits, joint ventures between nephrologists and dialysis companies raise legal and ethical concerns…

Dialysis-Facility Joint-Venture Ownership — Hidden Conflicts…

Despite potential benefits, joint ventures between nephrologists and dialysis companies raise legal and ethical concerns…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now