Leadership

How the VA’s ‘Stand Down’ Resolved 56,000-Plus Urgent-Care Consults

Case Study · April 14, 2016

The Department of Veterans Affairs recently addressed a national crisis of prolonged wait times by successfully executing a nationwide, single-day “Stand Down” event to ensure that veterans who were at greatest risk were seen first. As a result of this effort, almost all of the 56,000-plus urgent-care consults that were originally identified have now been reviewed and successfully resolved.

Key Takeaways

  1. When access to care becomes a systemic problem, it is critical to identify and address the highest-priority needs of patients first.

  2. Communicating expectations and objectives to leadership and staff is essential to success, and every staff member must understand his or her role in achieving it.

  3. Systemic problems require the development and implementation of new processes that will sustain success and prevent problems from recurring in the future.

  4. Stand Downs, which address significant organizational needs, followed by system improvements, should be considered as tools to address both short-term and long-term objectives.

The Challenge

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) operates the largest integrated health care system in the country, with over 1,700 sites of care that serve almost 9 million veterans. Systemic challenges resulting from veterans’ demand for services that exceeded the capacity of the VA to deliver timely care led to a national crisis in 2014. Media reports on the VA’s access crisis suggested that hundreds of thousands of veterans may have been in immediate jeopardy due to long wait times for clinical services.

In addition, because of the way that the data on wait times had been maintained, it was not clear how many veterans were truly at risk for harm due to a delay in accessing care. This lack of data prevented us from effectively determining which action steps were most important in order to effectively address the access crisis. The VA had not previously analyzed its wait-time data on the basis of clinical urgency because of a number of data-limiting factors (for example, the electronic medical record allowed clinicians to order consults with 31 different prioritization categories).

The Goal

To accelerate efforts to improve these access issues, we planned and successfully executed a one-day “Stand Down” event simultaneously in all 168 VA medical centers throughout the country. The goal of our Stand Down event was to meet the urgent-care needs of our patients and to ensure that veterans who were at greatest risk were seen first.

In military terms, stand down means to take a break from combat duties. The VA has previously utilized Stand Down events in our efforts to address veteran homelessness. These efforts bring together the VA and community-based resources during a single event to provide a comprehensive set of services to assist those who are in significant need. Our Stand Down event called on staff to take a break from regular duties and come to work on a Saturday to address the urgent-care needs of veterans.

The Execution

Identifying Patients at Greatest Risk

We sought to focus our attention first on veterans who had been waiting the longest to be seen for primary care or other clinical services and were at the greatest risk for potential harm. The VA keeps data on wait times in a number of formats, but the measure that we found to be most reflective of the veteran experience was the number of veterans who had been waiting for care for more than 30 days beyond their preferred date for a consult or their clinically indicated date, as determined by a VA health care professional.

Since not all consults have the same urgency, we needed to identify veterans with the highest-priority needs first. We started by reclassifying our data on requests for consults into Urgent and Routine consults. We then sorted our data by the type of clinical service for which the veteran was waiting. A group of VA clinical leaders categorized all clinical services into clinical tiers. Tier 1 consults included all services for conditions that could have potentially serious medical consequences if there was a delay in care. For example, a consult for cardiology would be categorized as Tier 1, while a consult for audiology or a dietician would be categorized as a lower tier. Services that were determined to be Tier 1 and those that were classified as Urgent (as determined by the clinician who ordered the consult) were specifically targeted for the Stand Down.

A Coordinated System-Wide Approach

Once we had narrowed the scope of our challenge to the population of veterans whose urgent-care needs had either not been addressed at all or had not been addressed to their satisfaction, we set out to resolve these consults. Instead of having each of our 168 medical centers address their urgent consults in a different way and time frame, we decided to take a coordinated system-wide approach.

First, we organized a team of VA clinicians, administrators, practice management staff, and data analysts to plan the events across the country. The planning team was given two weeks to organize the national Stand Down. The team developed and distributed guidance for each VA site on how to conduct and locally staff its Stand Down.

Next, all 168 sites were provided with data on the wait time for each veteran with an urgent-care need. Many VA centers began contacting veterans the week before the Stand Down to offer appointments on the day of the event. These sites reached out to assess the clinical needs of the veterans who had been waiting longest for care. If veterans remained in need of care, they were offered the option of being seen by staff on the day of the Stand Down event. If veterans were not able to be seen that day or chose to wait, they were offered appointments at earlier dates whenever possible to decrease their wait.

Once the list showing the names and locations of veterans who had been waiting the longest for urgent care became available to the VA, there was a real sense of urgency to take action. As planned, the Stand Down occurred within two weeks after we obtained the data on urgent-care needs.

The National Stand Down Event

The national Stand Down took place on November 14, 2015. Each site contacted the targeted veterans on the wait lists, performed a clinical assessment of their current needs, and resolved the status of their consult with an updated plan of action. This plan of action could include asking a patient to come immediately to the VA medical center or a closer medical facility, scheduling a more timely appointment by creating additional time slots for seeing patients, or documenting that the veteran had already been seen or no longer required the consultation.

To assist the thousands of VA clinicians and many other staff and volunteers who participated in the Stand Down, we invited many of the VA’s partners to the Stand Down for on-site support during the event. These groups included third-party administrators, veterans service organizations, labor unions, volunteer organizations, academic partners, and the U.S. Department of Defense. We also sent executives from Washington, D.C., to sites across the country to augment our field staff. A command center at VA headquarters monitored the event as it unfolded at all of the sites that day.

The Metrics

We originally identified 56,527 urgent-care consults as needing to be reviewed. On November 16, 2015, we determined that 55,794 of the consults had been reviewed for clinical urgency and, of those, 46,046 patients had had their consult appropriately dispositioned (i.e., the veteran’s consult was closed, the veteran was seen but the clinical reports were not complete so the consult could not be closed at that time, or the veteran was scheduled for an upcoming appointment).

The remaining veterans — in the range of 10,000 or so — were unable to be contacted on the day of the Stand Down due to our inability to reach them (for example, because of a wrong phone number). Following the Stand Down, we continued our efforts to contact these veterans, and currently all but a few hundred have been reached and their urgent-care needs resolved.

Lessons Learned

After Action Review

Following the Stand Down, we requested that all 168 sites participate in an “After Action” review of the event and respond to questions about what went well, what could be improved, and what the VA can do to sustain the timeliness of care and prevent future delays.

The Stand Down taught us that, during a crisis, it is important to first ask the right question in order to prioritize efforts. In addressing the access crisis at the VA, this question was: Which veterans are at greatest risk from a delay in care? Once we were able to identify the highest-priority veterans, it was important to use those data to achieve and track measurable results.

As a result of data analytics developed for the Stand Down, all VA medical centers now have a real-time dashboard that shows all urgent consults and their wait times on a real-time basis.

Example of VA Medical Center Real-Time Dashboard

VA Medical Center Real-Time Dashboard. Click To Enlarge.

In addition, we recognize that every patient’s sense of what constitutes an urgent-care need and what constitutes successful resolution may be different. VA clinicians now have only two levels of urgency to choose from when ordering consults (down from 31), and, as we redesign our systems for access, we recognize the need to educate veterans in how to work together to match their needs and VA resources.

Next Steps

Following the Stand Down, the VA committed to implementing same-day access for primary care and “First Contact Resolution” for mental health by the end of 2016. This goal is part of the overall transformation plan that seeks to bring human-centered redesign principles to the VA.

Our goal is to sustain the success of our first Stand Down and to not allow the backlog of urgent consults to rebuild. We are now implementing systemic approaches for improving access and sharing best practices across the system. Following the success of the first event, a second national Stand Down event was held on February 27, 2016. The use of Stand Downs, followed by systems redesign, is a new way of thinking that will help us in our quest to meet the health needs of veterans who require our help the most.

Call for submissions:

Now inviting expert articles, longform articles, and case studies for peer review

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

More From Leadership
Fiscus01_pullquote - humanizing physician performance review

Humanizing the Annual Physician Performance Review

Transforming the review process from a punitive, deflating experience to a valuable one that strengthens the relationship between physician and organization.

People Believe Strongly That Leadership Can Be Taught

Leadership Survey: Leadership Skills Are Teachable and Vital

Leadership is teachable, and leadership development and training are important, according to our survey on the topic. Yet the same survey reveals that more than half of respondents think their organizations’ efforts to develop and train leaders are lacking in quality and time commitment.

A Preliminary Model of Determinants and Consequences of Unhurried Conversations with Patients

Careful and Kind Care Requires Unhurried Conversations

Health care providers must have time to know their patients in “high definition” to best meet their needs.

From the Commonwealth to Obamacare: Reflections on 10+ Years of Expanding Health Insurance Coverage

The former Executive Director of the Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector — a model for the Affordable Care Act and other state marketplaces — reflects on what worked, what didn’t, and what could be done differently in both Massachusetts and at the federal level.

Time Spent Engaging Directly with 16 Camden RESET Participants or Coordinating Care on Their Behalf

“Putting All the Pieces Back”: Lessons from a Health Care–Led Jail Reentry Pilot

The Camden Coalition’s jail-based reentry program illuminated the necessity and challenges of engaging people with complex health and social needs and helping to transform the systems that serve them.

Sands01_pullquote clinical research partnership for learning health care

Real-World Advice for Generating Real-World Evidence

If envisioned and implemented properly, a partnership between clinical delivery systems and clinical research programs can get us closer to the goal of achieving learning within the care continuum and discovering evidence that is available when it is needed.

The Largest Share of Organizations Do Not Have a Formal Strategy for Clinician Engagement

Leadership Survey: Why Clinicians Are Not Engaged, and What Leaders Must Do About It

Clinician engagement is vital for improving clinical quality and patient satisfaction, as well as the job satisfaction of clinicians themselves. Yet nearly half of health care organizations are not very effective or not at all effective at clinician engagement.

Rowe01_pullquote - clinician well-being - fighting clinician burnout and creating culture of wellness takes all stakeholders

Defending the Term “Burnout”: A Useful Tool in the Quest to Ease Clinician Suffering

Health care leaders must take a preemptive approach to clinician well-being that is supported by all stakeholders and prioritized on an equal footing with essential clinical and financial measures.

Screenshot from the NewYork Quality Care Chronic Condition Dashboard

Success in a Hospital-Integrated Accountable Care Organization

How NewYork Quality Care achieved shared savings — by strengthening collaboration, enhancing care management with telehealth, and transparently sharing performance data.

Miller03_pullquote social determinants whole-person

How a State Advances Whole-Person Health Care

Pennsylvania addresses social determinants of health by bringing together managed care and social services organizations to expand access to vital resources.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Leading Transformation

284 Articles

From the Commonwealth to Obamacare: Reflections…

The former Executive Director of the Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector — a model for the…

Physician Burnout

53 Articles

Humanizing the Annual Physician Performance Review

Transforming the review process from a punitive, deflating experience to a valuable one that strengthens…

From the Commonwealth to Obamacare: Reflections…

The former Executive Director of the Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector — a model for the…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now