Leadership

Tiered Escalation Huddles Yield Rapid Results

Article · March 7, 2018

As leaders, we like to think we have all the information we need to address issues effectively and efficiently; but in reality, the information we have is often lagging, coming to us in post-problem, aggregated reports. The information that leaders really need is at the front lines and in real time; and, in just 15 minutes each day, leaders can communicate and align the organization to what is most important.

A significant amount of any health system’s knowledge lives in the heads of its caregivers; providing them with a fast and convenient way to escalate that information to leadership can have lasting impacts on response times and critical action plans that resolve safety, practice, access, and stewardship issues.

That communication channel can also build a culture of respect and value within an organization and bridge the age-old “does management care?” gap by showing caregivers that leadership is listening to them and addressing issues proactively.

Intermountain Healthcare learned early on that it is not enough to escalate issues and ideas from front line to manager; there are items that must be escalated even further up the chain of command, including up to the executive level. So the health system has implemented daily, tiered escalation huddles that start with frontline caregivers (Tier 1) and end with the executive leadership team (Tier 6) — all occurring before 10:30 each morning.

Daily Tiered Escalation Huddles at Intermountain Healthcare

  Click To Enlarge.

15 Minutes a Day at Tier 6

The huddles are brief meetings in which the participants stand around huddle boards — whiteboards divided into sections, showing dashboard metrics, charts, lists of new ideas, and other information. In Tier 1, frontline caregivers convene to review safety events and other KPIs, as well as the resources needed to complete their daily tasks or implement new ideas.

Relevant metrics and issues are then reported up through additional tiers based on escalation protocols involving different levels of management, until the most critical information — matters needing system-level attention — reaches the most senior executives in Tier 6. Through this process, Intermountain is able to get data and issues to the CEO within 24 hours, ensuring that leaders are aware of problems and able to resolve them in a timely way.

At the Tier 6 huddle — scheduled for just 15 minutes each day — the executive leadership team stands before its system-level huddle board and receives reports on issues from group leaders, hospital CEOs, and central functions such as information systems, legal, and communications. Some participants are present in person and others call in. The reports concern matters that need the immediate and collective attention of the top executives, with a particular focus on removing barriers that interfere with caregiving.

Leaders then write action plans and give follow-up reports in subsequent Tier 6 huddles to close the loop on escalated items. The escalation items and the process itself are reviewed quarterly to ensure that the program addresses key organizational priorities and facilitates the ability to adapt to the trends discovered through the escalation process that require additional transparency or focus.

One of the most important benefits of this process is the early identification of trends — which allows for speedy interventions, sometimes leading to an initial corrective action within 24 to 48 hours. Hospital-acquired infections, downtime of information systems or equipment, power outages, caregiver injuries, patient falls, capacity and access issues, and other performance indicators are tracked continuously. For example, senior leaders can address capacity issues at one facility by coordinating diversions to other facilities, keeping patients within the Intermountain system. Safety events can be investigated immediately, with system-wide alerts sent to prevent similar events. Caregivers can detect and quickly address epidemiological issues such as E. coli outbreaks.

Intermountain’s process helps operations “return to green” much more rapidly compared to the older process in which information came to management’s attention on a slower periodic basis, sometimes weeks or even months after events. Issues can be addressed and resolved without reaching the Tier 6 level. For a period of nearly 10 months (April 17, 2017, through January 30, 2018), the program has assigned and closed 305 actions at the Tier 6 level.

The Tier 6 huddle also performs an important secondary function: It allows leaders from across the system to collaborate on issues they might have previously thought they alone were experiencing. Sharing practices that are working well — and those that are not effective — leads to improved consistency, transparency, and performance system wide. Often, great ideas developed in one area can be rapidly replicated in other areas, improving outcomes and reducing inappropriate variation in quality and cost.

After less than 1 year of daily Tier 6 huddles, the gains are measurable, and participants have faster response times, better awareness, and stronger collaboration in solving problems and preventing new problems. Intermountain is addressing safety issues more effectively. Patient and customer service issues are identified and resolved faster. Leaders see capacity more clearly, which allows for more control over transfers out of the system and hospital diversions.

Examples of Success

One of the most compelling examples of the benefit of the escalation huddles is an improvement in the downtime of imaging equipment. The huddles revealed a pattern of delays in repairs to MRI, CT scan, and other imaging devices, and Intermountain discovered the delays were often caused by international shipping processes, where the parts were coming from abroad and were delayed going through customs.

Intermountain discussed the problem with the device manufacturers, who were able to streamline their international shipping processes. The result was significantly faster arrival of needed parts and significantly reduced equipment downtime. And all customers of these suppliers benefited — not just Intermountain.

Other improvements include:

> Capacity improvement: We receive daily reports on units at capacity and transfers out of the system. Early in the process, it was evident that we transferred a number of patients out of our system due to capacity issues for behavioral health needs. This led us to: 1) report where we had capacity, to help reduce transfers out of the system; and, 2) analyze the out-of-network service requests and approvals our insurance company, SelectHealth, was receiving, as well as the behavioral health network of providers. For example, out-of-network Service Approval Requests declined from 400+ in January 2017 to 147 in August 2017, as access/availability of contracted providers increased.

> Patient safety: Rapid training on new bedside rail equipment was implemented system wide when a caregiver experienced a safety issue with patient.

> Safety alerts: Safety events are communicated up through the huddles and a safety alert is communicated back down through the organizations for initial corrective action within 24 to 48 hours. Dozens of actions have been communicated through this process, including initiating a number of national recalls.

> Staff concerns: Grievances received in the C-suite were down 25% from a year ago after only 3 months into the Tier 6 huddle process.

> Information alerts: Pharmacy shortages and alerts are sent out immediately enterprise wide.

> Patient access: Medical group clinics reported marked improvements within 3 months; phone access (8-5, M-F) was available at 99% of clinics, up from 53%; appointment availability reached 86%, up from 53%; and extended clinic hours were available at 83% of clinics, up from 49%.

> Best practices: Utah Valley Hospital NICU implemented the UCLA Medical Center NICU safety protocol after learning of it from a grandfather visiting the UVU NICU.

Intermountain continues to develop its tiered escalation huddle process; for example, leaders continue to refine the list of key performance indicators that should be reviewed in Tier 6. But the benefits of the process are already clear: faster response, better sharing of best practices, enhanced esprit de corps, and improved safety, quality, access, and efficiency.

It all adds up to better care and service for patients. In just 15 minutes a day, health system leaders can know what frontline caregivers know and how they can support the people who do the work. That may be the most powerful information to have in health care.

Call for submissions:

Now inviting expert articles, longform articles, and case studies for peer review

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

More From Leadership
Fiscus01_pullquote - humanizing physician performance review

Humanizing the Annual Physician Performance Review

Transforming the review process from a punitive, deflating experience to a valuable one that strengthens the relationship between physician and organization.

People Believe Strongly That Leadership Can Be Taught

Leadership Survey: Leadership Skills Are Teachable and Vital

Leadership is teachable, and leadership development and training are important, according to our survey on the topic. Yet the same survey reveals that more than half of respondents think their organizations’ efforts to develop and train leaders are lacking in quality and time commitment.

A Preliminary Model of Determinants and Consequences of Unhurried Conversations with Patients

Careful and Kind Care Requires Unhurried Conversations

Health care providers must have time to know their patients in “high definition” to best meet their needs.

From the Commonwealth to Obamacare: Reflections on 10+ Years of Expanding Health Insurance Coverage

The former Executive Director of the Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector — a model for the Affordable Care Act and other state marketplaces — reflects on what worked, what didn’t, and what could be done differently in both Massachusetts and at the federal level.

Time Spent Engaging Directly with 16 Camden RESET Participants or Coordinating Care on Their Behalf

“Putting All the Pieces Back”: Lessons from a Health Care–Led Jail Reentry Pilot

The Camden Coalition’s jail-based reentry program illuminated the necessity and challenges of engaging people with complex health and social needs and helping to transform the systems that serve them.

Sands01_pullquote clinical research partnership for learning health care

Real-World Advice for Generating Real-World Evidence

If envisioned and implemented properly, a partnership between clinical delivery systems and clinical research programs can get us closer to the goal of achieving learning within the care continuum and discovering evidence that is available when it is needed.

The Largest Share of Organizations Do Not Have a Formal Strategy for Clinician Engagement

Leadership Survey: Why Clinicians Are Not Engaged, and What Leaders Must Do About It

Clinician engagement is vital for improving clinical quality and patient satisfaction, as well as the job satisfaction of clinicians themselves. Yet nearly half of health care organizations are not very effective or not at all effective at clinician engagement.

Rowe01_pullquote - clinician well-being - fighting clinician burnout and creating culture of wellness takes all stakeholders

Defending the Term “Burnout”: A Useful Tool in the Quest to Ease Clinician Suffering

Health care leaders must take a preemptive approach to clinician well-being that is supported by all stakeholders and prioritized on an equal footing with essential clinical and financial measures.

Screenshot from the NewYork Quality Care Chronic Condition Dashboard

Success in a Hospital-Integrated Accountable Care Organization

How NewYork Quality Care achieved shared savings — by strengthening collaboration, enhancing care management with telehealth, and transparently sharing performance data.

Miller03_pullquote social determinants whole-person

How a State Advances Whole-Person Health Care

Pennsylvania addresses social determinants of health by bringing together managed care and social services organizations to expand access to vital resources.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Leading Transformation

284 Articles

From the Commonwealth to Obamacare: Reflections…

The former Executive Director of the Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector — a model for the…

Physician Burnout

53 Articles

Humanizing the Annual Physician Performance Review

Transforming the review process from a punitive, deflating experience to a valuable one that strengthens…

From the Commonwealth to Obamacare: Reflections…

The former Executive Director of the Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector — a model for the…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now