New Marketplace

The Road to the New Health Care Marketplace

Article · November 25, 2015

Health care is in turmoil. But it’s not chaos — it’s change. Irresistible market forces, disruptive as they may be, could mean change for the better — a better health care marketplace.

Most people accept the need for a higher-value health care system with a price tag our society can afford. But many health care stakeholders are straddling two worlds, unsure when (or even whether) to exit the old and enter the new.

We believe that the stakeholders who cross the threshold quickly will find business success and professional pride on the other side. That bold move involves four key steps.

  1. Make value for patients the overarching goal. The new marketplace must focus on meeting patients’ needs, and it must be affordable. Putting patients at the center doesn’t mean they alone determine what care they should get — it means that providers organize themselves to optimize patients’ care plans, reduce suffering, and earn patients’ trust with compassionate, coordinated care. That’s what it will take to play the game; to succeed at it will mean excelling at meeting the needs of particular patient segments efficiently.
  2. Welcome competition. Competition drives innovation, improvement, and efficiency. It creates fear of losing, which is often what motivates individuals and organizations to contemplate change. Like any incentive, though, competition can be a blunt instrument that produces unintended effects. But we think that the alternatives to competition, such as shifting costs to patients or regulatory actions, are less desirable. Cost-shifting can make patients forgo care that might help prevent illness and disability, and it often breeds resentment. Regulation creates a floor below which performance should not go, but competition is likely to improve performance above that floor.
  3. Create social capital. Providers should respond to competition by developing relationships that increase the value of their care. Many providers are wondering whether they should merge or form other kinds of partnerships. Payers are asking the same questions. What matters in the end is not how organizations are structured, but the results they achieve through their collaborations. In short, do they increase the value of care? The London Stroke Initiative, which has concentrated acute-stroke care at just eight of London’s 34 hospitals, is a clear example of how social capital can lead to productive collaboration. The result: a 25% reduction in mortality and 6% lower costs.
  4. Encourage insurance choice. Every consumer should be able to pick his or her own insurance product. Insurance options used to be limited to something like vanilla versus French vanilla. Employers offered products that pretty much let patients go anywhere, thereby giving providers tremendous negotiating power if they just managed to get patients in the door. On today’s public and private exchanges, by contrast, many people with limited or no subsidies are selecting products with narrow networks for a powerful reason — they can afford those products. If more people choose insurance according to what they value and can afford, providers will be under great pressure to lower their costs and improve their services so that those services are included in the products that people are buying. They will compete to attract and retain patients by actually meeting their needs.

Value. Competition. Social capital. Insurance choice. These are the likely pillars of the new health care marketplace — one where people get care they want and can afford.

New Call for Submissions ­to NEJM Catalyst

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

More From New Marketplace
Birkmeyer02_pullquote - national physician practices NPPs

Aggregators, Innovators, and the Resurgence of National Physician Practices

A perspective on the growth of NPPs and the ideological divide between for-profit and nonprofit providers.

Hospital-based ACOs Key Capabilities Are Different Based on Level of Risk

Hospital-based ACOs Face Challenges in Tracking Performance Indicators

A focus on bundled payments for specific episodes of care — versus the broad changes required in an ACO model — may be a more effective method for ACO participants to develop capabilities required to measure utilization, cost, and revenue metrics.

Medicaid Referral to Specialist by the Numbers without eConsults

Can eConsults Save Medicaid?

How eConsults unlock medical expertise for the underserved.

Transparency Can Improve Both Quality and Cost of Care

Survey Snapshot: Seeing Progress in Transparency, but the Quest for Value Continues

NEJM Catalyst Insights Council members agree that despite the challenges and caveats, transparency efforts are essential.

Growth in alternative payment models shared savings shared risk bundled payments population-based payments

The State of the Evidence on Payment Reform

Despite some successes among the many efforts to execute value-oriented payment models, the lack of rigorous independent research studies impedes robust progress.

University of Utah Health Buzz Survey Report Cost of Care and Physician Responsibility Out-of-Pocket Costs

Buzz Survey Report: Cost of Care and Physician Responsibility

An independent NEJM Catalyst report sponsored by University of Utah Health on how practicing clinicians and health care leaders view health care costs.

Donald Berwick Melinda Buntin Patrick Conway Raymond Vara Edward Prewitt head shots IHI forum panel on health care policy

Signal or Noise? Navigating Health Care Policy — Part 2

A discussion from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement National Forum. Part 2 of a two-part series.

Transparency Initiatives Are Maturing But Have Far to Go

New Marketplace Survey: A Slow Path to Transparency for Patients

There is national momentum to empower patients with actionable health care information. But how well is the health care industry faring with this push to improve patient-facing transparency?

Donald Berwick Melinda Buntin Patrick Conway Raymond Vara Edward Prewitt head shots IHI forum panel on health care policy

Signal or Noise? Navigating Health Care Policy — Part 1

A discussion from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement National Forum. Part 1 of a two-part series.

Union Square Family Health Evolving Clinic Schedule - after integrated practice unit changes

Leveraging IPU Principles in Primary Care

How a safety-net clinic reorganized into multidisciplinary teams and restructured clinic flow to improve both efficiency and continuity of patient care.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Aggregators, Innovators, and the Resurgence of…

A perspective on the growth of NPPs and the ideological divide between for-profit and nonprofit…

Bundled Payments

51 Articles

Hospital-based ACOs Face Challenges in Tracking…

A focus on bundled payments for specific episodes of care — versus the broad changes…

Survey Snapshot: Seeing Progress in Transparency,…

NEJM Catalyst Insights Council members agree that despite the challenges and caveats, transparency efforts are…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now