New Marketplace

The Road to the New Health Care Marketplace

Article · November 25, 2015

Health care is in turmoil. But it’s not chaos — it’s change. Irresistible market forces, disruptive as they may be, could mean change for the better — a better health care marketplace.

Most people accept the need for a higher-value health care system with a price tag our society can afford. But many health care stakeholders are straddling two worlds, unsure when (or even whether) to exit the old and enter the new.

We believe that the stakeholders who cross the threshold quickly will find business success and professional pride on the other side. That bold move involves four key steps.

  1. Make value for patients the overarching goal. The new marketplace must focus on meeting patients’ needs, and it must be affordable. Putting patients at the center doesn’t mean they alone determine what care they should get — it means that providers organize themselves to optimize patients’ care plans, reduce suffering, and earn patients’ trust with compassionate, coordinated care. That’s what it will take to play the game; to succeed at it will mean excelling at meeting the needs of particular patient segments efficiently.
  2. Welcome competition. Competition drives innovation, improvement, and efficiency. It creates fear of losing, which is often what motivates individuals and organizations to contemplate change. Like any incentive, though, competition can be a blunt instrument that produces unintended effects. But we think that the alternatives to competition, such as shifting costs to patients or regulatory actions, are less desirable. Cost-shifting can make patients forgo care that might help prevent illness and disability, and it often breeds resentment. Regulation creates a floor below which performance should not go, but competition is likely to improve performance above that floor.
  3. Create social capital. Providers should respond to competition by developing relationships that increase the value of their care. Many providers are wondering whether they should merge or form other kinds of partnerships. Payers are asking the same questions. What matters in the end is not how organizations are structured, but the results they achieve through their collaborations. In short, do they increase the value of care? The London Stroke Initiative, which has concentrated acute-stroke care at just eight of London’s 34 hospitals, is a clear example of how social capital can lead to productive collaboration. The result: a 25% reduction in mortality and 6% lower costs.
  4. Encourage insurance choice. Every consumer should be able to pick his or her own insurance product. Insurance options used to be limited to something like vanilla versus French vanilla. Employers offered products that pretty much let patients go anywhere, thereby giving providers tremendous negotiating power if they just managed to get patients in the door. On today’s public and private exchanges, by contrast, many people with limited or no subsidies are selecting products with narrow networks for a powerful reason — they can afford those products. If more people choose insurance according to what they value and can afford, providers will be under great pressure to lower their costs and improve their services so that those services are included in the products that people are buying. They will compete to attract and retain patients by actually meeting their needs.

Value. Competition. Social capital. Insurance choice. These are the likely pillars of the new health care marketplace — one where people get care they want and can afford.

New call for submissions ­to NEJM Catalyst

Now inviting longform articles

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

More From New Marketplace
Dale04_pullquote_disrupting the value-based vs fee-for-service payment model

Disrupting the Payment Model

We should modernize our payment mechanisms to reflect the reality of our digitally enabled lives.

Percentage of Patients Choosing a Reference-Based Pricing Facility for Knee or Hip Replacement Surgery - 2008-2012 - value-based benefit designs

The Evidence for High-Value Benefit Designs

Innovative models are showing promise, but limited transparency and peer-reviewed research hamper expansion.

New Evidence on Stemming Low-Value and Overprescribing - Nudgind Physicians Toward Better Prescribing Practices

New Evidence on Stemming Low-Value Prescribing

New research suggests that deploying strong and surprising messages could help to address overprescribing of opioids and other drugs.

Wang01_pullquote medical devices - medical device innovation in China

Accelerating Medical Device Innovation in China

Promoting collaboration between clinicians, researchers, device-makers, and regulators.

Health Care Costs - Cost Transparency Is the Main Change Needed to Support Patients in Lowering the Cost of Care

Survey Snapshot: Is Transparency the Answer to Rising Health Care Costs?

NEJM Catalyst Insights Council members say that while transparency might be necessary, we have to change the way care is delivered.

Many Stakeholders Share Responsibility for Lowering the Cost of Care

New Marketplace Survey: Patients Lack Information to Reduce the Cost of Care

Efforts to mitigate rising health care costs have left most industry participants — patients, providers, and payers alike — frustrated at the lack of progress. While there is plenty of blame to go around, a significant open question remains: how responsible are patients for reducing costs?

Hip or Knee OA Care Management - Musculoskeletal Institute and Bundled Payment Program at Dell Medical

Bundled Payments Are Moving Upstream

Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin has improved outcomes and reduced costs for musculoskeletal care with a multidisciplinary Musculoskeletal Institute and bundled payment model.

Elements of a Sustainable Complex Care Management Contract

Sustainable Financing for Complex Care Management Is Critical to a Value-Driven Health Care System

Care management should be payer-agnostic at its core.

Comparison of Certain Model Features in Blue Cross NC Blue Premier vs Next-Generation ACO Model vs BCBSMA Alternative Quality Contract

Engineering a Rapid Shift to Value-Based Payment in North Carolina: Goals and Challenges for a Commercial ACO Program

We believe North Carolina can be a model for the nation.

Small Molecule Drugs Facing Generic Competition - Orphan and Non-Orphan Drugs - Orphan Drug Act

It’s Time to Reform the Orphan Drug Act

Three proposals for improving the law to reflect 21st-century drug development practices.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Vertical Integration and Bold Experimentation

Four points on improving value in health care via vertical integration and aggressive experimentation.

Value Based Care

203 Articles

Disrupting the Payment Model

We should modernize our payment mechanisms to reflect the reality of our digitally enabled lives.

Medicare and Medicaid

124 Articles

“You’re Old Without Hearing Aids”— Addressing…

Hearing loss isn’t a normal consequence of aging. But it is associated with a higher…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now