Patient Engagement II

Patient Engagement versus Patient Experience

Article · May 17, 2017

My neurologist brain is having a hard time. My brain — and yours — likes order. Yet trying to make sense of the rampant use of health care buzzwords like engagement, experience, consumerism, activation, etc., is causing major brain freeze.

The field of patient experience has exploded. At the same time, as population health efforts multiply, efforts to engage patients in their own health have become very popular. Yet these two concepts seem disconnected. Health care professionals talk about engagement in health, but not always the experience of it. We talk about the experience of our patients, but not always their engagement. So . . . what are we really talking about? Do we even know?

To further thicken the plot, technology vendors have leapt into the engagement space and are designing many intelligent, empathic solutions to drive engagement and experience. Yet, in a recent conversation with the CEO of an engagement technology company, I asked how he measures patient engagement. His response: “number of downloads or clicks.” I felt pretty sure that the academic community would find that inadequate. Download frequency may be a helpful metric for engaging people in technology, but not necessarily their health.

Here is my (left) brain’s attempt to differentiate engagement and experience, based on my roles as a practicing neurologist and Chief Experience Officer of the Cleveland Clinic.

patient engagement vs patient experience

  Click To Enlarge.

Clearly, there are significant differences between the two concepts. Yet the comparison raises important, head-scratching questions for clinicians and patients alike:

  1. Who is at the end of what we are talking about? Focusing only on patients is limiting. It seems people engagement might be more fitting, as it is rare that the patient is navigating his or her health alone — clinicians, communities, and the patient’s friends and family likely also have a significant role in patient care.
  2. Is the patient an active or passive participant? As a colleague of mine has pointed out, an engaged patient interacts with their health or the delivery of care, but a patient experience can be passive. In that way, experience is something that happens to On a roller coaster, for example, patients can get on the ride, close their eyes, and wait for it to be over; or they can scream and throw their hands in the air and have fun. Both takes are valid.
  3. What’s the context? Engagement means to interact with something, so what and who is the patient interacting with? The options include his or her own health, a clinician, the health care system, a community, and/or technology. This context matters and defines the measurement.
  4. What is the locus of control, and who decides what the engagement looks like? If health care systems are held accountable for managing populations and will be reimbursed based on whether patients are engaged or not, then what happens to patient choice? Alternately, if a patient doesn’t want to engage, will we respect this or enforce our engagement strategy regardless? I often use the example of a young mom with multiple sclerosis who works full time. She doesn’t want to be reminded she has MS and actively minimizes her touchpoints. That doesn’t mean she is “noncompliant” or disengaged — it means she has choice.
  5. What’s the ideal state of engagement? If a clinician has highly engaged patients who order their own tests, schedule appointments online, and get all preventative care, but the care team is completely burned out, the power of relationship-centered care is absent.

For patients to be truly engaged in their health, they must demonstrate certain behaviors that reflect their engagement. The best statement I have seen builds on a behavior engagement framework put forth in 1996 by the Center for Advancing Health, based on the work of J.H. Hibbard and others on patient activation. It defines engagement as “actions individuals must take to obtain the greatest benefit from the health care services available to them.” In other words, a patient must engage with the resources available in order to maximize his or her own health. I like it.

In the end, patient engagement and patient experience both have this funny word in front of them: patient. Ultimately, patients must play a significant role in these definitions.

New Call for Submissions ­to NEJM Catalyst

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

More From Patient Engagement II

Data Graphic: CMOs and Staff Physicians Lead Patient Engagement Efforts

Survey respondents say CMOs and staff physicians head patient engagement efforts within health care organizations, but it’s important to note who does the ranking.

How Chronic Pain Treatment Falls Short of Patient-Centered Care

Healing the opioid epidemic requires nothing less than a comprehensive theory of patient health.

Evaluating Complex Care Programs: Is It a Zero-Sum Game?

Policymakers see programs for complex patient populations as a way to bend the health care cost curve, but are reduced health care utilization and costs the right measures of success?

Toyin Ajayi Talk Still: The Difference Between Noncompliance and Defiance

The Difference Between Noncompliance and Defiance

How do we align our goals for patient engagement with even the most complex, difficult patients?

Hardwiring Patient Engagement to Deliver Better Health

Imagine a world in which health care was not “one size fits all,” but customized for each patient individually.

Health Care — A Final Frontier for Design

Design must move beyond narrow projects and encompass complex systems.

Engineering Social Incentives for Health

It’s important to engineer social engagements that promote health, but we must also test their acceptability and effectiveness.

When — and How — Can Incentives Actually Work?

Incentives can work if they’re designed a bit better.

My Favorite Slide: When Patients Are Prevented from Engaging

If patient engagement is about action, why don’t we let them speak?

Using a “Nursing Bundle” to Achieve Consistent Patient Experiences Across a Multi-Hospital System

How Geisinger addressed inconsistent patient experience by creating a nursing bundle that helped make patients’ experiences more consistent.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Patient-Centered Care

187 Articles

The Digital Experience Must Also Be…

The most humane experiences happen when we meet patients where they are by designing the…

The Digital Experience Must Also Be…

The most humane experiences happen when we meet patients where they are by designing the…

Patient Incentives

51 Articles

The Power of Social Connectedness

We often don’t consider purpose in life and social connectedness when developing health care programs…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now