Patient Engagement

Patient Engagement Survey: Improved Engagement Leads to Better Outcomes, but Better Tools Are Needed

Insights Report · May 12, 2016

Analysis of the first NEJM Catalyst Insights Council survey on the Patient Engagement theme. Qualified executives, clinical leaders, and clinicians may join the Insights Council and share their perspectives on health care delivery transformation.

METHODOLOGY AND RESPONDENTS

  • In February and March 2016, an online survey was sent to the NEJM Catalyst Insights Council, which includes U.S. health care executives, clinician leaders, and clinicians at organizations directly involved in health care delivery. A total of 340 completed surveys are included in the analysis. The margin of error for a base of 340 is +/- 5.3% at the 95% confidence interval.

  • The majority of respondents were clinicians (44%), followed by clinician leaders (32%) and executives (25%). Most respondents described their organizations as hospitals (38%) or health systems (17%). These hospitals were predominantly midsized (32% had 200–499 beds) or larger (49% had 500 or more beds).

  • Only 9% of respondents indicated that their major affiliation was with a physician organization. Those physician organizations tended to be big — 75% had 100 or more physicians.

  • Nearly three-quarters of the organizations (72%) were nonprofit, with the remainder of respondents coming from for-profit organizations. Every region of the country was well represented.

In recent years, there has been a shift toward a greater role for patients in health delivery. We are all aware of the greater focus on shared decision-making, patient satisfaction scores, information on provider price and quality to patients, and the use of incentives embedded in benefit design (such as high-deductible health plans) that put the onus on the patient to behave like a consumer and assess the value of different health services they could receive.

But how do we define engagement? What are typical ways in which it is measured? Do clinicians think their patients are engaged? What can be done to improve this?

In this first NEJM Catalyst Insights Report on patient engagement, we describe results of a recent survey that collects insights from health care executives, clinician leaders, and clinicians from around the United States. We surveyed our Insights Council, a group of distinguished and experienced leaders, to better understand the landscape of patient engagement, ranging from a working definition of the phrase to which strategies they feel are most helpful (and which are not).

When asked their definition of patient engagement, most respondents highlighted the following components. Patients are:

  • Interested in participating in choices about their health care
  • Responsibly taking ownership of those choices and adhering to their care plans (ideally co-created with providers)
  • Taking an active role in improving their health

These definitions illustrate the important role of the patient, both in health behavior and their interaction with the health system. Yet a strikingly low percentage of patients — per the assessment of the council — are highly engaged: 42% of respondents indicated that less than a quarter of their patients were highly engaged, and more than 70% report having less than half of their patients highly engaged. Executives were more negative about patient engagement levels than were other respondents; 54% of executives said that less than a quarter of their patients were highly engaged. Only 9% of survey respondents overall reported high rates of engagement in a large share (more than three-quarters) of their patients.

Patient Engagement Insights Chart: Percentage of Highly Engaged Patients

Patient Engagement Insights Report. Click To Enlarge.

These results highlight the challenges in front of us; while having patients who are engaged with their health and with the health system is important, low rates of engagement appear to be the norm.

A further challenge is that while the majority of Council members — 86% — report that their organizations use systematic tools to collect this data, most regard their current measurement approaches as, at best, only somewhat effective.

Patient Engagement Insights Report Chart: Patient Engagement Measurement and Tracking

Patient Engagement Insights Report. Click To Enlarge.

Respondents viewed internal surveys of patients as the most effective, but only 33% of respondents see them as completely or mostly effective. This does raise the question of whether better tools are needed to assess engagement, perhaps involving real-time assessments of behavior as opposed to surveys.

Patient Engagement Insights Report Chart: Effectiveness of Various Approaches

Patient Engagement Insights Report. Click To Enlarge.

Council members have strong opinions about which interventions work, and which do not. Fifty-nine percent of respondents support having members of the care team (physicians, nurses, or other clinicians) spend more time with patients. Clinicians felt more strongly than executives about more time spent with patients (66% vs. 51%); when asked about the biggest challenge to improving patient outcomes, clinicians cited not enough time with patients (57% clinicians vs. 32% executives).

Patient Engagement Insights Report Chart: Biggest Challenges in Improving Patient Health Outcomes

Patient Engagement Insights Report. Click To Enlarge.

When people advocate for “time spent with patients,” it naturally leads to the question of how this could be afforded, given the high existing cost of health services in the United States. New health financing arrangements that shift from fee-for-service to health systems bearing financial risk may make it possible for clinicians to spend more time with higher-risk patients, but only if they spend less time with lower-risk patients. A shift toward asynchronous communication using emails, better use of physician extenders, and approaches like “automated hovering” with wireless devices could help.

Patient Engagement Insights Report Chart: Most Effective Patient Engagement Initiatives

Patient Engagement Insights Report Click To Enlarge.

Fifty-four percent of survey respondents believe that shared decision-making is another most effective strategy.

Other approaches, such as working with health plans to provide incentives to improve their health (24%) and giving patients information (23%), received limited support. This may reflect a general lack of comfort in working with health plans and a lack of success with previous efforts to educate patients to motivate behavior change. The use of wireless devices (5%) garnered less support than we expected. The explanation may be that the current use of wearables is still quite limited, and clinicians haven’t seen data showing improvements in chronic disease management. In addition, there is evidence that without engagement strategies, technology alone is unlikely to change behavior for higher-risk patients. There may also be concerns about how all these additional streams of data will be handled and about the burdens they could impose on clinicians.

Patient Engagement Insights Report Chart: Least Effective Patient Engagement Initiatives

Patient Engagement Insights Report. Click To Enlarge.

We view this survey as providing health care executives, clinical leaders, and clinicians with some baseline information on patient engagement.

The survey highlights that respondents view engagement levels among their patients as low and recognize that how engagement is measured is inadequate, and it suggests that we haven’t yet discovered optimal ways of achieving high rates of sustained patient engagement. This is a rapidly evolving field, and what is regarded as ineffective today — such as remote monitoring devices — may be viewed very differently in the future, as new technologies and service models that take full advantage of them emerge. In the coming months we will search for evidence of effective approaches to both measurement and the achievement of successful engagement among patients. We are also interested in highlighting approaches that don’t work, as both kinds of examples can highlight important learnings for the field.

Check NEJM Catalyst for monthly Insights Reports not only on Patient Engagement, but also on Care Redesign and the New Marketplace.

VERBATIM COMMENTS FROM SURVEY RESPONDENTS

How do you define patient engagement?

“Patient being an active participant in their care. This would include asking questions. Being respectful to the staff and Dr. Following instructions such as bringing in all medications to every visit. Showing up on time.”
— Physician at a for-profit clinic in the South

“Patients that take some sort of action in their care. I see it as a catchphrase for everything from a marketing perspective to another IT pitch.”
— Executive at a small community hospital in New England

“Patients either calling us or answering our calls, making and keeping appointments — both initial and follow-ups.”
— Chief Medical Officer at a midsized, for-profit care provider in the Mountain West

“Effort to make healthy lifestyle changes, compliance with meds, realistic advance directives, and priority in value.”
— Physician at a small community hospital in New England

“Supporting people to more fully understand their situation, the options available to them, and the steps they can choose to improve their lives.”
— Executive at a midsized nonprofit clinic in New England

“Patient participates in his/her own health objectives, takes medications, maintains reasonable weight, exercises.”
— Chief Medical Officer of a midsized physician organization in the South

“Patients considered part of the care team, able to self-advocate for their care without fear of retaliation.”
— Physician at a midsized academic medical center in the Midwest

“Patients are informed about how the system works, participate in decision making, and are interested in giving feedback to foster improvement.”
— Service line manager at a large community hospital in the West

“Patients who are interested in their own health and show at least some signs of activation to actually improve it.”
— Chief Medical Officer of a midsized, nonprofit health system in New England

“Patient involvement in choosing among options and, more importantly, following recommendations for therapies/lifestyle changes when prescribed.”
— Physician executive at a large, nonprofit health system in the South

“Exercise 30 minutes a day and shop in the periphery of the supermarket.”
— Physician at a for-profit clinic in the Midwest

“Use patient portal.”
— Executive at a large, nonprofit health system in the South

Join the NEJM Catalyst Insights Council and contribute to the conversation about health care delivery transformation. Qualified members participate in brief monthly surveys.

Call for submissions:

Now inviting expert articles, longform articles, and case studies for peer review

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

More From Patient Engagement
Agarwal01_pullquote handcrafting the patient experience

Handcrafting the Patient Experience

Health care organizations can take cues from consumer-facing companies like Airbnb to creatively insert convenience and surprise into patient encounters.

Screenshot of Tidepool daily diabetes data

A Taxonomy to Engage Patients: Objectives, Design, and Patient Activation

Health information initiatives will succeed only if they focus on patients’ motivation to engage and reflect the type of engagement they seek.

Ghafur01_pullquote -digital health health care consumer patient experience

Engaging Patients Using Digital Technology — Learning from Other Industries

Providers can benefit patients and disrupt health care by learning from the experience of other industries.

Mission Hospital Virtual Sitter - Drawing of the Virtual Bed Zone and Rails

Reducing Inpatient Falls and Injury Rates by Integrating New Technology with Workflow Redesign

How Mission Hospital scaled a virtual sitter pilot and reduced unassisted falls by 44% and fall-related injuries by 40%.

Health Care Providers Should Incentivize Patients

Survey Snapshot: Patient Financial Incentives — There Are No Quick Fixes

The NEJM Catalyst Insights Council agrees that while financial incentives are a common strategy to engage patients in healthy behaviors, they are not necessarily effective.

Support of Family and Friends Is More Effective Than Clinician Support in Realizing Health Goals - From the Patient Engagement Insights Report: Why No Single Health Incentive Works.

Patient Engagement Survey: Why No Single Health Incentive Works

Initiatives to improve patient engagement come in a variety of forms. While insurers, employers, and health care providers are all involved in using financial incentives and penalties for engagement efforts, improvement in health outcomes has been elusive. Achieving that ultimate goal will usually require a combination of financial and social approaches.

Health Systems Attending the Nudge Units in Health Care Symposium - Penn Medicine

Key Insights on Launching a Nudge Unit within a Health Care System

Leaders are finding that making higher-value choices easier through subtle changes to choice architecture can have an outsized impact on medical decision-making.

Barriers to Providing an Oustanding Patient Experience

Buzz Survey Report: Patient Experience

An independent NEJM Catalyst report sponsored by University of Utah Health on barriers to achieving an excellent patient experience.

The Patient Engagement Capacity Framework

The Patient Engagement Capacity Model: What Factors Determine a Patient’s Ability to Engage?

Patient engagement assessments often don’t dig deep enough to identify why patients don’t participate in their own health care. We present a new model to help providers pinpoint the reasons for lack of engagement and address them more effectively.

Organizational Mindset Is the Biggest Barrier to Engaging Patients as Consumers

Survey Snapshot: The Patient-Physician Relationship Is Key

Both parties involved in a consumer-facing transaction have access to important information about the product or service — but this isn’t the case with health care.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Patient Incentives

74 Articles

Saving Lives with Virtual Cardiac Rehabilitation

Collaboration and innovation can improve the performance of cardiac rehabilitation.

Ripe for Disruption: Why and How…

For big tech companies like Amazon, Apple, and Google, the health care sector looks ripe…

Patients As Customers

138 Articles

Handcrafting the Patient Experience

Health care organizations can take cues from consumer-facing companies like Airbnb to creatively insert convenience…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now