Care Redesign

Integrating Social Needs with Care Delivery

Interview · January 11, 2016

Anna Roth and Amy Compton-Phillips

As CEO of Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers, a large publicly funded health system in the San Francisco Bay Area, Anna Roth sees the challenges in shifting from volume-based to value-based care — but she also sees the opportunity.

Since June 2014, Contra Costa has partnered with Health Leads, a service provider aimed at integrating patients’ basic needs into care delivery. Through a Health Leads resource desk located in one of Contra Costa County’s health centers, providers now can direct patients to resources that have an impact on health, such as food and housing.

Roth sat down with Amy Compton-Phillips to talk about her health system’s innovative care model and the role of community partnership.

Amy Compton-Phillips: You have talked about how the social determinants of health can influence outcomes of care delivery. Programs such as Health Leads can help health systems provide for social needs, but they depend on external funding. How can we help make that funding sustainable?

Anna Roth: I think the answer begins with who pays for health care now. Patients, providers, employers, health plans, and taxpayers are all paying for the rework that is going on across U.S. health care. The goal is to go beyond producing health care and to produce better health. It may not be a simple process, but the money is already moving toward that end.

At the beginning of 2015, CMS set out goals to start to pay for value, not just volume. There are also many national demonstration projects, local programs, and initiatives at the system level, like in my own, that are happening across the country. Each has its own approach, but the important thing is that we are starting to think about smart investments that will ultimately result in a better patient experience, a healthier population, and affordable care.

Compton-Phillips: It sounds like you have already started on that journey. Have you figured out a way to incentivize physicians to focus on prevention?

Roth: Our health system is paid in two ways, and one is, like many other integrated systems, through our own self-funded health plan. We are monitored and paid using outcome measures such as HEDIS and other standardized scoring systems.

As a public hospital in California, the second way we are paid is through our Section 1115 Waiver. Over the last five years, we’ve had the Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment Program, which is an innovation incentive that has fueled initiatives such as PCMH transformation, our partnership with Health Leads, and alternative care offerings including telemedicine and telephone appointments.

In a fee-for-service environment, these programs would have no mechanism for payment. So, these federal demonstration projects, programs attached to federal waivers at the state level, and the innovative relationships we’re building are a promising way forward.

Compton-Phillips: Given these financing arrangements, have you been able to actually get your providers off fee-for-service reimbursement?

Roth: We are still somewhere in the middle of fee-for-service and capitation. We all dream of a fully reformed health care system and the payment reform that goes along with it, but that will take a while. Like everyone else, we have to think smart about how the health care spend is distributed within our population, how we can leverage the finite resources we have, and how to make our investments wisely.

For instance, does it make sense to pay for three or four extra primary care visits because a patient’s A1C is out of control? Or is it better to make a smart investment to ensure they have the resources they need for the refrigerator to be on, so that insulin can be stored properly and they can manage their diabetes?

Compton-Phillips: How do we get better at leveraging community assets in the health care system?

Roth: In health care, we often get tripped up trying to own and operate everything. We have not been world-class partners in reaching out to our community. We even hire navigators so members of our community can find their way through the complexity of our systems.

It is time we look beyond the four walls of our institutions and see how we can partner with those who have already mastered things like housing and employment. There are expert agencies, like the nationwide 211 program and other nonprofits, who are better at that than we’re probably ever going to be. We should learn how to work with them. If these networks and organizations are not as strong as we would like them to be, maybe the role we can play is to be strong partners for them so they can strengthen themselves.

Compton-Phillips: Do you have any advice for the physicians and caregivers in safety-net hospitals to maintain their resilience and avoid burnout?

Roth: I don’t know if I have advice, but I do recognize that it’s hard work. People inherently went into this profession because they want to help people. They want to ease suffering. We need to position providers to be able to do that, rather than face the daily frustration of generating interventions that only go so far.

This really hit home with me when we sat down recently with providers in one of our larger clinics and shared data from our Health Leads resource desk. We showed them that the number one need met by our Health Leads advocates was food. Some of our providers choked up. Many have worked for decades in the center of this safety net with no way to meet that kind of need. In the past, the best they could do was make a blind referral, close the office door, and live with not really knowing what happened.

Now we can tell them that their patients were connected to food. That is how you build resilience: by surrounding providers with tools that help them meet the needs of people they’ve dedicated their lives to serving.

New Call for Submissions ­to NEJM Catalyst

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

More From Care Redesign
Consensus That Design Thinking Is Useful in Health Care

Survey Snapshot: Design Thinking Is Useful, So Why Aren’t More People Using It?

NEJM Catalyst Insights Council members agree that design thinking useful, but leadership buy-in and understanding of how to implement it may create barriers.

Artificial Intelligence AI Technologies - 5 Approaches to Augmentation of Health Care Decision-Making

Artificial Intelligence and the Augmentation of Health Care Decision-Making

Artificial intelligence is most likely to improve health care by augmenting the work of human clinicians.

Improving Scores Through Human-Centered Design

Designing and Implementing Better Patient Experiences

An ophthalmology provider with facilities in the greater Mexico City area is using Human-Centered Design to improve both the patient and staff experience.

Joseph04_pullquote_hospital_wellness

Designing Hospitals That Heal as Well as Treat

Hospitals must provide wholesome food, sound sleeping conditions, and human connection to promote healing and wellness.

Health Care Organizations Only Occassionally Apply Design Thinking

Care Redesign Survey: How Design Thinking Can Transform Health Care

Health care leaders and frontline clinicians are eager to embrace design thinking. Yet its principles are not widely applied.

Chernew04_pullquote targeted supplemental data collection

Targeted Supplemental Data Collection — Addressing the Quality-Measurement Conundrum

Targeted supplemental data collection may be a valuable approach to balancing data needs with data-collection costs.

Opioid Prescriptions Strength Conversion Table

Tackling the Opioid Crisis with Clear Prescription Guidelines, Accurate Monitoring, and Provider Education

How a large physician organization reduced the amount of opioids prescribed per patient while increasing referrals for pain management consultation.

David Waters Community Servings CEO

Food as Medicine: Meeting the Needs of Complex Medical Diets

How Community Servings evolved from an HIV nutrition program to one that feeds people with any illness.

HaH-Plus Program Reduces Patient Days Spent in Health Care Facilities in Final 180 Days of Life

Hospital at Home–Plus Reduces Days Spent in Hospitals and Other Inpatient Facilities

Patients enrolled in Mount Sinai Health System’s HaH-Plus program spend about one-third as many days in health care facilities as inpatients in the last 180 days of life.

SLUCare General Internal Medicine Interactive Voice Response - Patient Access

Creating a Holistic Approach to Patient Access

To get beyond simplistic measures such as increased patient appointments or decreased lag days, operations administrators and physician champions must develop effective partnerships.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Moving from a Sickness Model of…

A public health expert discusses the scientific, technological, and financial foundations we need to modernize…

Quality Management

139 Articles

Better Physician Ratings from Discussing PROs…

A UPMC study demonstrates the value of PROs, but finds that physicians need to discuss…

Coordinated Care

113 Articles

Improving Patient Flow with Dynamic Work…

Staff make big improvements in post-operative care by changing small details.

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now