Care Redesign

Survey Snapshot: What’s Standing in the Way of Care Redesign?

Insights Report · June 1, 2016

We talked to executives, clinical leaders, and clinician members of our Insights Council for a closer look at the major obstacles preventing increased value in care.

 

Understanding the top barriers to improving the value of health care is critical to the transformation of health care delivery. Without clarity about what is standing in the way of value-based care, health care leaders and practitioners will be unable to move forward with clinical practice initiatives and other opportunities outlined in Care Redesign Report: Why Population Health Management is Undervalued.

The top obstacle identified in NEJM Catalyst research to improving the value of care was the fee-for-service payment system, according to 52% of respondents overall, as well as 59% of executives and 63% of clinical leaders participating in the survey. Thomas Yackel, MD, MPH, MS, FACP, CPE, Vice President and Chief Clinical Integration Officer at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, says that fee-for-service creates a misalignment across health care. “The moral imperative for physicians is to be conservative with the application of health care, while the business imperative is to always do more.” Value-based care, he says, will solve this disparity.

Joel Reich, MD, FACEP, MMM, Senior Vice President for Medical Affairs and Chief Medical Officer at Eastern Connecticut Health Network in Manchester, points out that the fee-for-service system doesn’t align incentives with better long-term health, coordination of care, or managing the social determinants of health. “Fee-for-service says, ‘I did this, so I get paid for this,’” he says. “There is nothing in it financially that would push people to work in a more unified manner.”

He believes reimbursement that is directly tied to care quality, outcomes, and management of the total cost of care will enable alignment of care providers.

Providers should be incentivized to change how they deliver care, he says. In a value-based world, integrated networks would promote healthy eating and activity, use community care managers and home health extensively, and be more likely to take advantage of telehealth, including remote patient monitoring and telepsychiatry, to integrate behavioral health services. “Instead of selling health services, we would truly deliver health,” he says.

Respondents to the NEJM Catalyst survey differed in their perception of the patient role in health care. More than half of clinicians (52%) ranked “lack of patient engagement in improving their own health” as their choice for top barrier. Overall, respondents ranked this as the second greatest obstacle to improving the value of care.

Titus Abraham, MD, an internist at Annapolis (Maryland) Internal Medicine, and the physician manager for the practice, says that while he believes lack of patient engagement is a significant issue, he calls it “a two-way street.” “The role of the doctor has diminished,” he says. “Patients are seeking care from other sources such as the Internet, television programming, and so-called ‘alternative providers.’” Abraham believes the onus is on physicians to be more assertive in finding out why a patient is going elsewhere for care.

“Primary care providers, if adequately knowledgeable themselves, can provide the needed context for information and can provide the needed healthy skepticism and evidence-based thinking to determine the role and value of testing and treatment,” he says.

For instance, when he found out a patient of his who had suffered panic attacks had been consulting other doctors and was scheduled for a coronary catheterization, he asked the patient and his wife to see him first. Abraham recommended the patient see a psychiatrist before the procedure. The patient was later diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder rather than cardiac disease.

The third-greatest barrier to improving the value of care, named by 41% of respondents to the NEJM Catalyst survey, was lack of integration of different types of facilities (such as tertiary and community hospitals and non-acute care). Terrill Theman, MD, Adjunct Professor of Healthcare Systems Engineering at Lehigh University, and a former practicing cardiothoracic surgeon, believes that a lack of accountability has hindered care coordination. “When I was in practice, since I was getting the majority of the fee associated with the illness, I made it my job to integrate that patient’s care and get sign-off from all members of their care team,” Theman says. He experienced a fractured delivery system that left patients feeling like no one took responsibility for them. “They need someone who is captain of the ship to make sure everyone talks to one another and that there is a reasonable treatment plan.”

Theman says value-based care makes him optimistic about the future of care delivery, though the rollout has not been perfect. “At least the Affordable Care Act shook the pot and got us working on solutions.”

Care Redesign Insights Report Chart: Barriers to Improving Value of Care

From the Care Redesign Insights Report: Why Population Health Management Is Undervalued. Click To Enlarge.

Call for submissions:

Now inviting expert articles, longform articles, and case studies for peer review

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

More From Care Redesign
Murali01_pullquote Home Recovery Care patient satisfaction

No Place Like Home: Bringing Inpatient Care to the Patient

Providing home-based acute care improves patient satisfaction and care quality while reducing costs.

Rating the Raters - Strengths and Weaknesses Assessment of the Four Public Hospital Quality Rating Systems - 2a

Rating the Raters: An Evaluation of Publicly Reported Hospital Quality Rating Systems

Some promising innovation is taking place among organizations that rate hospital performance, but major systemic change is needed in the field to ensure access to meaningful comparisons through better data and relevant metrics, and to establish integrated oversight through robust audits and peer review.

McKee01_pullquote - the need for coordinated care IPUs for Parkinson's disease

Creating “One-Stop Shop” Care for Parkinson’s

Integrated Practice Units (IPUs) can revolutionize the care of specialty disease conditions, and Parkinson’s disease is a good place to start.

Good Shepherd culturally competent hospice care home visit to the widow of a recently deceased patient

Strangers No More: Culturally Competent Add-On Programs for Diverse Seniors

Creating specialized culturally competent programs to improve patient satisfaction and address the unique health care needs of older immigrants.

Kimberly Dennis and David Newton head shots - SunCloud Mental Health Services

Addressing the Lack of Continuity of Care in Mental Health Services

Co-founders of an integrative outpatient treatment center for mental health and addiction discuss the problematic lack of continuity of care between inpatient and outpatient and physical and mental health services.

Epic OB Hemorrhage PPH Risk Assessment Tool and Alerts at PSJH - Preventing Maternal Death

Improving Maternal Safety Through an EMR Risk Assessment

After a mother died of postpartum hemorrhage, Providence St. Joseph Health made organization-wide changes to prevent future maternal deaths and injuries.

Most Health Care Organizations Have Palliative or End-of-Life Care Programs

Survey Snapshot: Challenging the Resistance to “Palliative”

NEJM Catalyst Insights Council members agree that palliative care is gaining traction, but one of many barriers is getting providers over their resistance to the word “palliative.”

The Assessment of Care Tool - Consisting of Six Visual Analog Scales Corresponding with the IOM Six Dimensions of Perfect Care

Real-Time Pursuit of Outcomes That Matter to Patients

A simple and affordable tool to use at the point of care to drive value creation within clinical microsystems.

Many Patients Who Would Benefit from Palliative - End-of-Life Care Do Not Receive It

Care Redesign Survey: The Power of Palliative Care

Our NEJM Catalyst Insights Council survey on palliative care reveals an interesting dichotomy: While the great majority of organizations have a palliative or end-of-life care program, 60% of patients who would benefit from such services don’t receive them.

Heart Safe Motherhood and Way to Health Two-Way Texting for Blood Pressure Monitoring for Postpartum Women with Preeclampsia

Heart Safe Motherhood: Applying Innovation Methodology for Improved Maternal Outcomes

At the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, a text message–based blood pressure surveillance program for postpartum women with preeclampsia improved blood pressure management, reduced readmissions, and increased patient and provider satisfaction.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Coordinated Care

141 Articles

Creating “One-Stop Shop” Care for Parkinson’s

Integrated Practice Units (IPUs) can revolutionize the care of specialty disease conditions, and Parkinson’s disease…

Physician Incentives: Importance of the Why

When moving health care providers forward in the world of value-based care and population health,…

Primary Care

196 Articles

No Place Like Home: Bringing Inpatient…

Providing home-based acute care improves patient satisfaction and care quality while reducing costs.

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now