New Marketplace

Survey Snapshot: Plusses and Minuses of Value-Based Care

Insights Report · June 29, 2016

We talked to executives, clinical leaders, and clinician members of our Insights Council for a closer look at the advantages of moving to value-based care.

 

To convince a health care organization to migrate across the spectrum from fee-for-service to value-based care, leaders have to identify and promulgate the advantages. What will be the big wins for adopting new payment models?

According to New Marketplace Insights Report: Value-Based Payment Gains Traction Amid Active M&A Environment, respondents are tied at 54% on viewing the top advantage as “payers are insisting on it” and as “it will improve care quality.”

“I would have thought ‘payers are on insisting on it’ would have been the top one — period,” says Laurie Gianturco, MD, Vice President and Chief Medical Officer for Health New England, a provider-owned, nonprofit health plan with 200,000 members in Massachusetts and Connecticut.

The pressure being applied by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to have 90% of all traditional Medicare payments tied to quality or value by 2018 should be impetus enough, Gianturco says.

But she acknowledges that the value-based discussion is a tough one for many health care organizations. “Hospital systems and providers make money for fee-for-service. That’s not guaranteed in value-based care, and it’s going to be a lot of work,” she says.

In addition, providers will have to take risks and implement evidence-based outcomes and quality measures. “That’s not something they have a strong background in doing,” she says.

Because of these hurdles, she recommends that physicians receive support through the transition. “In these initial [value-based care] models, there is tremendous burden put on physicians. The models are constantly changing, with no proven value to them yet,” she says.

She’s optimistic, though, that value-based care will better align everyone on the health care continuum, improve quality, and control costs.

But Caroline Poplin, MD, JD, FACP, physician at the Arlington (Virginia) Free Clinic, sees a difficult road ahead for physicians because of value-based care. “They won’t have more time for patients; they’ll just have more patients,” she says.

She says the value-based care argument gets complicated when medicine and wellness are intermingled. “What internists like me should be doing is coordinating care . . . not organizing someone’s effort to lose weight.” Wellness efforts can be a poor use of a physician’s education and experience, she says.

The demands of value-based care lead to “a disconnect between the leadership and the clinicians in the trenches,” she says. For example, when an obese person comes in for a cold, a physician has to remember to talk to him about vaccinations and cholesterol, and make sure he is working on his weight and has a living will. “Physicians find this approach much harder and less satisfying,” she says.

Paul Nelson, MD, primary care physician at Family Health Care PC in Omaha, Nebraska, isn’t convinced that value-based care will result in better quality.

“Primary care is not insurable by the standard sense of the word, because so much of what you do is manage uncertainty,” he says.

Nelson, a 40-year veteran of primary care, says there is a lack of connection between the social mandate for basic health care needs and the economic mandate for complex health care needs.

For instance, he prefers to have a registered nurse answer the phone at his practice. “If patients have a change in health, the RN knows who needs to be seen immediately,” he says, adding patients call in a timely way because they trust the RN answering the phone. However, the skill set utilized in answering calls is not reimbursable, according to Nelson.

He thinks new payment models “discount” the primary care physician’s role in health care as well, and that things he can do to help people “are not honored by the system.” Therefore, Nelson has decided to move toward retirement.

One survey respondent, a vice president of practice transformation at a midsized health institution in the South, who asked to not be named, says the retirement discussion has come up a lot. “The quality issue is a personal one for physicians, but there is value in accepting volume measures,” she says.

She wasn’t surprised that only a third of respondents to the NEJM Catalyst survey said that “organizationally and clinically, we are best equipped for” value-based care, because she doesn’t believe most are. While hospital-owned practices will be looked out for and supported by their parent organization, “an awful lot of small practices and solo practitioners might be on the negative payment side at the beginning,” she says.

However, she hopes that insurers will reimburse providers upfront for the infrastructure they’ll need, such as updated EMR systems, care navigators, and access to behavioral health expertise.

“[Value-based payments] are going to hurt and are going to be painful, but everyone has to understand that health care costs were untenable and something had to change,” she says.

Top Advantages of Moving to Value-Based Care

Top Advantages of Moving to Value-Based Care. Click To Enlarge.

New call for submissions ­to NEJM Catalyst

Now inviting longform articles

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

More From New Marketplace
Health Care Costs - Cost Transparency Is the Main Change Needed to Support Patients in Lowering the Cost of Care

Survey Snapshot: Is Transparency the Answer?

NEJM Catalyst Insights Council members say that while transparency might be necessary, we have to change the way care is delivered.

Many Stakeholders Share Responsibility for Lowering the Cost of Care

New Marketplace Survey: Patients Lack Information to Reduce the Cost of Care

Efforts to mitigate rising health care costs have left most industry participants — patients, providers, and payers alike — frustrated at the lack of progress. While there is plenty of blame to go around, a significant open question remains: how responsible are patients for reducing costs?

Hip or Knee OA Care Management - Musculoskeletal Institute and Bundled Payment Program at Dell Medical

Bundled Payments Are Moving Upstream

Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin has improved outcomes and reduced costs for musculoskeletal care with a multidisciplinary Musculoskeletal Institute and bundled payment model.

Elements of a Sustainable Complex Care Management Contract

Sustainable Financing for Complex Care Management Is Critical to a Value-Driven Health Care System

Care management should be payer-agnostic at its core.

Comparison of Certain Model Features in Blue Cross NC Blue Premier vs Next-Generation ACO Model vs BCBSMA Alternative Quality Contract

Engineering a Rapid Shift to Value-Based Payment in North Carolina: Goals and Challenges for a Commercial ACO Program

We believe North Carolina can be a model for the nation.

Small Molecule Drugs Facing Generic Competition - Orphan and Non-Orphan Drugs - Orphan Drug Act

It’s Time to Reform the Orphan Drug Act

Three proposals for improving the law to reflect 21st-century drug development practices.

Three-Part Pricing of PCSK9 Inhibitors

A New Model for Pricing Drugs of Uncertain Efficacy

Are we paying too much for new drugs before we know how well they work? This innovative pricing model proposes postponing major rewards until efficacy is established — which could help both patients and payers while still paying back investments on the most effective drugs.

what does quality measurement in health care mean

Buzz Survey Report: Addressing the Problems of Quality Measurement

An independent NEJM Catalyst report sponsored by University of Utah Health on patient involvement in quality measurement.

Average HOOS and Average KOOS for patients undergoing hip and knee replacement at CJRI

Building a “Hospital-within-Hospital” Model for Joint Replacements

The Connecticut Joint Replacement Institute has demonstrated that formerly competing independent providers can unite on a common vision to yield drastic improvements in quality, safety, and costs.

Discharge Rates and Follow-Up Internval Dashboard for One Provider at MGH Dermatology

A Successful Pilot to Improve Access by Adjusting Discharge and Follow-Up Rates

Actionable data and modest financial incentives can help motivate clinicians to adjust their behavior around scheduling follow-up appointments.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Transforming Specialty Practice in Pursuit of…

Despite significant primary care reform around patient-centered medical home models, specialty care remains fragmented, with…

Bundled Payments

61 Articles

Bundled Payments Are Moving Upstream

Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin has improved outcomes and reduced…

New Marketplace Survey: Patients Lack Information…

Efforts to mitigate rising health care costs have left most industry participants — patients, providers,…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now