Care Redesign

Creating a Holistic Approach to Patient Access

Case Study · May 3, 2018

The call to improve patient “access” is often focused on improving a specific metric, whether that is increasing the number of patient appointments or decreasing lag days. While these are important metrics, access isn’t just appointments or lag days or clinic session length. Improving access requires a holistic approach to the clinic’s operations — examining multiple metrics and their relationships — and a strong partnership between a physician champion and operations administration.

Key Takeaways

  1. Access isn’t just a single metric. Getting the right patients into the right appointment with the right provider requires a holistic approach to clinical operations.

  2. A deep dive is necessary to determine current state and often results in a number of unexpected findings.

  3. A physician leader present in clinic is critical to achieving physician buy-in.

The Challenge

In the summer of 2016, the Saint Louis University General Internal Medicine primary care clinic (SLUCare GIM) had reached a crisis — incoming phone abandonment rates were rising weekly, from 30% to 40%, eventually reaching almost 50%, with wait times of 40 minutes or longer. While improving telephony access and service levels had been a goal for some time, it was thrust into the spotlight as an immediate imperative.

The Goal

Improve overall patient access by streamlining clinical operations with an initial focus on telephony access and service levels.

The Execution

The two-part execution comprised assessing the current situation and developing corrective actions.

Determining Current State: The first step was a deep dive to determine current state of clinic operations (including staff and provider interviews, clinical observation, and data review). Incoming calls were answered by three medical assistants (MAs) functioning as switchboard operators; they routed most calls to nurse triage. The MAs were inconsistently able to handle routine tasks such as medication refills and appointment scheduling due to variable training and lack of policies and protocols. As a result, the clinic was unable to deliver one-call resolution, leading to increased work and volume of calls. For example, when a medication refill was not completed or was completed incorrectly, additional calls came into clinic (both from patients and pharmacies) for further resolution.

It was difficult to fully understand the current state of the clinic’s telephony performance due to limitations in data. The MAs answered the primary clinic line. In an effort to create a workaround, triage nurses gave patients their “back line” numbers, resulting in frequent calls directly to nurse triage (to avoid long wait times of the main clinic number). Because of these backline calls, as well as the configuration of phone systems, we were unable to determine the number of unique calls coming into clinic, the total number of calls coming into clinic, average hold times, average handling times, and average lag time between calls. Our limited data set made it difficult to determine the workforce necessary to handle calls moving forward.

As we discovered the chaos of the clinic phone systems, it was evident that the current system was negatively affecting our clinic staff’s morale and performance. We had high MA turnover and absenteeism. There were no defined staff roles and responsibilities, resulting in the overall feeling that “everyone was responsible” and no one was held accountable.

Creating the Future State: Using the call abandonment rate and overall number of phone calls coming to the clinic main number, we set out to improve our telephone access and service levels. We first instituted an interactive voice response (IVR) or “phone tree” as each call’s first clinic contact. The IVR replaced our MA switchboard; we retained and redistributed our MAs into more clinical roles that aligned with their license. The IVR routed calls to improve first-call resolution and minimize wait and handle times. Significant discussion occurred around an IVR option to speak to a physician/nurse. Ultimately, we did not include this as an initial option. Because we lacked specific data on caller type and because our patients were used to speaking directly to a nurse regardless of their concern/need, we were concerned that patients would bypass the IVR, choosing only to speak to the physician/nurse. We do plan to reevaluate this as an addition to the IVR after analyzing use and routing data.

SLUCare General Internal Medicine Interactive Voice Response - Patient Access

  Click To Enlarge.

We contracted with RelateCare, a health care communications consultancy company that specializes in patient access and engagement solutions, to move our scheduling calls off-site and out of the clinic. This required the creation of uniform scheduling protocols. A review of the 30+ possible appointment types for SLUCare GIM revealed that only 7 appointment types were utilized by providers. A scheduling protocol was created, defining each appointment type, duration, and appropriate utilization. The team also created an up-to-date provider directory, including associated advanced practice provider and resident teams, clinic session schedule, and provider-specific considerations.

Considerable redesign occurred in master schedules; for example, each provider’s master schedule was realigned to a 4-hour session duration, allowing for improved capacity within clinic. Radio buttons were added to the Follow-Up tab in the Epic electronic health record to ensure consistent, clear documentation of follow-up appointment type. Using these tools, off-site schedulers were able to uniformly schedule patients, ensuring the right patient with the right provider at the right time. Each call interaction was scripted and recorded to encourage early arrival to appointments, MyChart sign-up, preregistration and overall enhanced service levels. Each call agent with RelateCare was evaluated on a sample of the recorded calls through the use of an agent KPI scorecard. Call abandonment rates declined and hold and handling times improved. We also saw a statistically significant change in the number of scheduled appointments (increase) and new patient lag days (decrease).

To address clinic staff disorder, we interviewed multiple staff members and created a list of all clinical tasks as well as each clinic staff member’s skills/credentials. After several sessions with clinic leadership and representative MAs, we created standardized roles and responsibilities for our clinical care teams. New standardized roles were implemented in January 2017; over the subsequent months, our staffing stabilized (between April 2016–January 2017, we saw nine employees leave; between January–August 2017, one employee left). Our absenteeism also declined. Quality metrics completed by MAs improved — specifically, depression screening (completed during patient rooming) increased from 51% to 95% over 6 months. The MAs now have a sense of clinic ownership, which is anecdotally evident through their participation in clinic huddles, creating daily room assignments, and self-reported happiness. From the patient experience perspective, both clinic staff and providers are now able to focus on delivering high-quality care, rather than apologizing for the poor phone access and difficulties in scheduling appointments.

Our interventions occurred concurrently — RelateCare began scheduling appointments at the same time we implemented the IVR and our staff’s roles and responsibilities were redefined. This makes it difficult to attribute change to any one specific intervention; however, as a holistic approach, it made a significant impact.

The Team

Four key roles were involved in this effort:

  • Physician Champion: In both the clinical aspects of health care and in this process improvement initiative, the physician serves as the nucleus of the high-performing team. The physician champion must be someone who “lives” in clinic — someone who is regularly present, experiencing changes as they occur. This position provides clinical vision and critical peer leadership. She/he must be willing to dedicate the time and effort to problem resolution, soliciting and then incorporating feedback from all members of the clinical team. She/he must truly champion the project, creating a sense of urgency, celebrating successes, and pushing forward through setbacks. Culture change was and is one of the largest hurdles of this project. The physician champion must take the anger and frustration that significant change brings and harness those disruptions into constructive information to make real-time adjustments to new processes.
  • Operations Administration: This role requires experience in process improvement and operations redesign. In our project, our operations administrator took the lead in negotiating contract terms with RelateCare, and assisted in protocol creation and master schedule redesign, as well as data compilation. The operations administrator must work collaboratively with the physician champion to ensure a holistic approach is taken to improve clinical operations.
  • Leadership: Individuals from both the practice C-suite and department chair were critical in this project’s success. Leadership buy-in ensured the resources — financial and personnel — necessary to the project’s success.
  • Clinic Management: In our case, this role was filled by our clinic nurse supervisor. The person filling this role should be consistently available in clinic, and must have rapport with the clinic staff and the authority to hold them accountable. They bring invaluable input to developing policies and protocols and refining roles and responsibility assignments. They must be able to troubleshoot problems as they arise. This role is critical in evaluating efficacy of change and offering ideas and solutions for continual improvement.

The Metrics

The key metrics included call data, appointment data, and return on investment.

Call Data. We studied the Saint Louis University General Internal Medicine calls offered (i.e., calls presented to the queue), abandonment rates, hold time, wrap time, and average speed to answer. NB: A notable difference in the number of incoming calls (more than 300% reduction) is attributed to answering on the first call (i.e., patients did not need to call back repeatedly) and to an increased first-call resolution; however, as limited pre-project data is available, we are unable to know definitively.

SLUCare General Internal Medicine Telephony Data - Patient Access

  Click To Enlarge.

Appointment Run Charts. We analyzed the real-time impact of go-live on January 27, 2017. Go-live of multiple interventions included: RelateCare scheduling support, IVR implementation, and redefinition of staff roles and responsibilities. Data included new patient lag day, new patient scheduled appointments, and all scheduled appointments.

SLUCare General Internal Medicine New Patient Lag Day Run Chart - Patient Access

  Click To Enlarge.

  • New Patient Lag Day Run Chart (statistically significant p<0.05). This shows a statistically significant decrease in the new patient (patients who have never been seen in General Internal Medicine or who have not been seen in the last 3 years) lag days (days between the date an appointment is scheduled and the actual appointment). Concurrent interventions were implemented Jan. 27, 2017 (indicated by green line). Median new patient lag days decreased from 37 (blue line) to 31 days (gray line).
SLUCare General Internal Medicine New Patient Scheduled Appointments Run Chart - Patient Access

  Click To Enlarge.

  • New Patient Scheduled Appointments Run Chart. This shows a statistically significant increase in the number of new patient (patients who have never been seen in General Internal Medicine or have not been seen in the last 3 years) appointments scheduled per week. Concurrent interventions were implemented Jan. 27, 2017 (indicated by green line). Median number of appointments scheduled increased from 69 appointments/week (blue line) to 79 appointments per week (gray line).
SLUCare General Internal Medicine All Scheduled Appointments Run Chart - Patient Access

  Click To Enlarge.

  • All Scheduled Appointments Run Chart. This shows a statistically significant (p<0.05) increase in the number of all (including new and return/established) appointments scheduled per week. Concurrent interventions were implemented Jan. 27, 2017 (indicated by green line). Median number of appointments scheduled per week increased from 600 (blue line) to 638 (gray line) appointments.

Return on Investment. We analyzed cost and reimbursement data based on the number of scheduled appointments.

SLUCare General Internal Medicine Patient Access Redesign Return on Investment Extrapolated to 12 Months

Definitions: Avg. Scheduled Appointments per Month: average of appointments scheduled in February–June. Avg. Reimbursement per Appointment: based on reimbursements July 2016–June 2017 per patient appointment in SLUCare General Internal Medicine practice. Avg. Total Reimbursement per Month: calculated by multiplying Avg. Scheduled Appointments per Month by Avg. Reimbursement per Appointment. Avg. Annual Reimbursement: calculated by extrapolating Avg. Total Reimbursement per Month to 12 months. Avg. Annual Cost Scheduling Support calculated based on total salary, benefits, training requirements, and consultant fees (where applicable) for three scheduling agents. Click To Enlarge.

Where to Start:

  • Quantify your burning platform: Why is it important? How will this project improve overall clinic or practice value?
  • Identify project team: Ensure you have a strong physician leader, operational knowledge, and buy-in from leadership.

Call for submissions:

Now inviting expert articles, longform articles, and case studies for peer review

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

More From Care Redesign
Diagram Illustrating the COPD Care Pathway at Allegheny General Hospital

End-to-End Care for COPD Patients that Improves Outcomes and Lowers Costs

Allegheny General Hospital created a comprehensive solution for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that led to improved clinical outcomes, reduced hospital admissions and readmissions, and a resultant decrease in the total cost of care.

David Blumenthal and Bob Galvin head shots

Ripe for Disruption: Why and How Big Players in the Private Sector Are Taking on Health Care

For big tech companies like Amazon, Apple, and Google, the health care sector looks ripe for disruption. Two executives working in different parts of the health care ecosystem discuss what this means for patients and doctors, including the positives and unintended consequences.

Top challenges facing chronic disease management care - insufficient time and care coordination

Care Redesign Survey: To Improve Chronic Disease Care, Change the Payment Model

Many health care organizations are reasonably effective in treating chronic diseases, but they are limited from doing better by fee-for-service payment, which remains the predominant payment model in the United States. This report serves as a snapshot in time, showing the intent of health care providers to be proactive in treating chronic disease, but limitations in their ability to address population health.

Nirav Shah head shot Stanford - AI in medicine and team care

What AI Means for Doctors and Doctoring

Physicians must hone the “four Cs” — critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and creativity — when leveraging AI as a new partner in their care teams.

End of Life EOL Palliative Care in the ED for Patients with Advanced Cancer - Process Map - MD Anderson Cancer Center

Patient-Centered Care at the End of Life in the ED

How MD Anderson Cancer Center is improving end-of-life care in an unlikely place: the emergency department.

Home-Based Cardiac Rehab - An Overview from Kaiser Permanente Southern California

Saving Lives with Virtual Cardiac Rehabilitation

Collaboration and innovation can improve the performance of cardiac rehabilitation.

Murali01_pullquote Home Recovery Care patient satisfaction

No Place Like Home: Bringing Inpatient Care to the Patient

Providing home-based acute care improves patient satisfaction and care quality while reducing costs.

Rating the Raters - Strengths and Weaknesses Assessment of the Four Public Hospital Quality Rating Systems - 2a

Rating the Raters: An Evaluation of Publicly Reported Hospital Quality Rating Systems

Some promising innovation is taking place among organizations that rate hospital performance, but major systemic change is needed in the field to ensure access to meaningful comparisons through better data and relevant metrics, and to establish integrated oversight through robust audits and peer review.

McKee01_pullquote - the need for coordinated care IPUs for Parkinson's disease

Creating “One-Stop Shop” Care for Parkinson’s

Integrated Practice Units (IPUs) can revolutionize the care of specialty disease conditions, and Parkinson’s disease is a good place to start.

Good Shepherd culturally competent hospice care home visit to the widow of a recently deceased patient

Strangers No More: Culturally Competent Add-On Programs for Diverse Seniors

Creating specialized culturally competent programs to improve patient satisfaction and address the unique health care needs of older immigrants.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Design Thinking

19 Articles

Handcrafting the Patient Experience

Health care organizations can take cues from consumer-facing companies like Airbnb to creatively insert convenience…

Ripe for Disruption: Why and How…

For big tech companies like Amazon, Apple, and Google, the health care sector looks ripe…

Care Redesign Survey: To Improve Chronic…

Many health care organizations are reasonably effective in treating chronic diseases, but they are limited…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now