Interprofessional Collaboration for a Health System in Crisis

Article · May 23, 2018

Editor’s note: This article was co-authored by Prof. Reeves and Dr. Patel before Prof. Reeves suddenly passed away this month. This is one of his last fully edited works of writing and is now published in his memory. Those who have worked with Prof. Reeves hope this article provides an insight into his work and its ongoing impact. The editors have been careful to respect Prof. Reeves’ contribution and preserve his point of view.


Health care systems vary from being socially driven and providing universal access to having a purely for-profit infrastructure. Across the board, these systems are under considerable pressure due to a variety factors such as lack of access, cost, and an increasing health care burden. These financial pressures are accompanied by a “perpetual winter of Narnia” as demand continues to increase and a clearly overworked workforce gets less motivated by the day. This trend is seen across many health systems and is not isolated to one particular country.

The recent focus has been primarily on funding as a result of doctor contract disputes and even strikes. However, there has been very little discussion around solutions that can potentially improve work efficiency, knowledge, and motivation — namely, a greater emphasis on interprofessional collaboration and interprofessional education.

Interprofessional What?

Interprofessional education is a model in which individuals from two or more professions in health care learn together during all or part of their professional and postgraduate training, with the objective of cultivating collaborative practice. This form of education is particularly effective in subspecialties in which the need for interprofessional collaboration and learning is most acute. For instance, in the field of emergency care, in which doctors work alongside nurses, paramedics, and others, the evidence is clear that work efficiency, motivation, and patient outcomes improve when training is driven by well-founded interprofessional principles at both the undergraduate and postgraduate levels.

For example, a recent study from an academic health center in Iowa demonstrated that Emergency Department visits and hospitalizations dropped by 50%–70% in the 12-month period following the development of an interprofessional, integrated approach to mental health in which patients received care from a team of psychiatry, family medicine, and primary care health workers. Moreover, positive findings were also noted at the 6-month mark, with hospitalizations representing >5% of all before-enrolment encounters, compared with only 2% of post-enrolment encounters.

That study clearly indicated that patients had lower odds of an emergency room visit or hospitalization and a greater likelihood of an outpatient psychiatry visit or primary care visit after enrolment in an interprofessional care management program as compared with before enrolment. The findings of that study suggest that, by focusing on interprofessional training, we can increase our capacity to shift care toward the primary care and community levels, where health care delivery is well known to be more effective and more beneficial for patients.

It is clear that many health care workers have not been exposed to interprofessional learning or methods of interprofessional collaboration that are well established within the education community. Countries such as Australia, Canada, Sweden, and Japan have made some useful gains in terms of integrated interprofessional collaboration and are clearly seen as nations whose health systems are in a better state (in terms of ranking, access, and outcomes) than those of the U.S. and other countries. In Japan, for example, a rapidly aging population has resulted in a large-scale reorganization of agencies and services to work in a more collaborative manner. These reforms are supported by an established set of interprofessional competencies designed to ensure that practitioners are “fit for purpose” in terms of working effectively together in interprofessional teams.

Going Beyond the Hospital

Interestingly, just as teamwork, communication, and collaboration are essential and highly valued among athletes, work is now commencing to investigate how collaboration can be applied in the field of field of sports medicine. Our research has shown that several factors (including negotiation, confidentiality, professionalization, and professional dominance) influence interprofessional collaborative practice and, ultimately, health outcomes. The lessons that we have learned by studying interprofessional education and collaboration in the field of sports medicine can be applied to the hospital and primary care settings.

Moving Forward with Technology

Integrating this ethos of interprofessional education and collaboration is essential for systems such as the National Health Service to continue to provide quality health care. Many may question the costs of implementing such practices, but the evidence is clear that interprofessional education is an essential foundation for fair and financially stable health systems. With our society becoming more technologically driven, postgraduate interprofessional learning can create a less isolated, more motivated, and more collaborative workforce.

Two of our recently published reviews, one on the effects of interprofessional education on the health workforce and the other on the role of technology and interprofessional education in primary care, have clearly shown the benefits of interprofessional education while calling for further research in this area. These benefits include the facilitation of collaborative practice and education through e-learning — for example, learning about pathology via digital microscopy or learning about safe insulin use and diabetes via an online module. Additionally, e-learning can lead to improvements in professional competence by providing a way to overcome geographic boundaries that can lead to isolation and a lack of motivation.

Looking Ahead

Providing better health care is not just about finances and spending more of our GDP on our health systems, increasing the number of health care workers per 1,000 population, or providing access 7 days a week. It is also about the training and collaborative practice within the health workforce at the primary and hospital levels. If we are to have a stable, socially based, efficient, and safe health system, it will be necessary for all of us, as health care workers, policymakers, and educators, to implement interprofessional learning and collaboration at all levels of our health care system.

Call for submissions:

Now inviting expert articles, longform articles, and case studies for peer review


A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

More From Leadership

From the Commonwealth to Obamacare: Reflections on 10+ Years of Expanding Health Insurance Coverage

The former Executive Director of the Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector — a model for the Affordable Care Act and other state marketplaces — reflects on what worked, what didn’t, and what could be done differently in both Massachusetts and at the federal level.

Time Spent Engaging Directly with 16 Camden RESET Participants or Coordinating Care on Their Behalf

“Putting All the Pieces Back”: Lessons from a Health Care–Led Jail Reentry Pilot

The Camden Coalition’s jail-based reentry program illuminated the necessity and challenges of engaging people with complex health and social needs and helping to transform the systems that serve them.

Sands01_pullquote clinical research partnership for learning health care

Real-World Advice for Generating Real-World Evidence

If envisioned and implemented properly, a partnership between clinical delivery systems and clinical research programs can get us closer to the goal of achieving learning within the care continuum and discovering evidence that is available when it is needed.

The Largest Share of Organizations Do Not Have a Formal Strategy for Clinician Engagement

Leadership Survey: Why Clinicians Are Not Engaged, and What Leaders Must Do About It

Clinician engagement is vital for improving clinical quality and patient satisfaction, as well as the job satisfaction of clinicians themselves. Yet nearly half of health care organizations are not very effective or not at all effective at clinician engagement.

Rowe01_pullquote - clinician well-being - fighting clinician burnout and creating culture of wellness takes all stakeholders

Defending the Term “Burnout”: A Useful Tool in the Quest to Ease Clinician Suffering

Health care leaders must take a preemptive approach to clinician well-being that is supported by all stakeholders and prioritized on an equal footing with essential clinical and financial measures.

Screenshot from the NewYork Quality Care Chronic Condition Dashboard

Success in a Hospital-Integrated Accountable Care Organization

How NewYork Quality Care achieved shared savings — by strengthening collaboration, enhancing care management with telehealth, and transparently sharing performance data.

Miller03_pullquote social determinants whole-person

How a State Advances Whole-Person Health Care

Pennsylvania addresses social determinants of health by bringing together managed care and social services organizations to expand access to vital resources.

Abigail Geisinger Scholars Program for Medical Students -Ryu02_pullquote

Why a Teaching Hospital Offers an Employment-Based Tuition Waiver Program

Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine subsidizes medical students’ education in exchange for their willingness to practice at Geisinger Health System.

Michael Dowling and Charles Kenney headshots

Rebooting Health Care: An Optimistic Outlook

The U.S. health care system may seem broken, but it’s on its way to greatness, according to the authors of Health Care Reboot. They discuss their optimism for U.S. health care reform, particularly on the social determinants of health, payment, consumerism, and technology.

Action Steps for Risk-Share Contracts for Medical Devices

Challenges and Best Practices for Health Systems to Consider When Implementing Risk-Share Contracts for Medical Devices

When done right, value-based contracting for medical devices can ameliorate shrinking margins at health systems, leading to a virtuous circle.


A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »


Leading Transformation

284 Articles

From the Commonwealth to Obamacare: Reflections…

The former Executive Director of the Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector — a model for the…

Physician Burnout

52 Articles

Survey Snapshot: How Do You Know…

The NEJM Catalyst Insights Council discusses strategies for clinical engagement.

From the Commonwealth to Obamacare: Reflections…

The former Executive Director of the Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector — a model for the…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now