Leadership

Gender Bias in Health Care: Glass Ceiling, or Foundation of Sand?

Article · December 13, 2016

As a frequent contributor to medical journals, I was struck by the recent NPR article highlighting the gender gap when it comes to who receives top-billing authorship in prestigious research journals. Women received only 37%.

American health care has made great progress embracing gender diversity and inclusion in the past half century. However, women physicians and scientists live and practice in the context of American society as a whole. Women represent only 21% of executives at Fortune 500 health care companies, and 19% of hospital CEOs, mirroring the low number of women in leadership positions outside of the health care industry.

In her brilliant book Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead, Sheryl Sandberg wrote about an unequal voice for women in America. What we are seeing in research papers is only one part of a systemic trend in our society, highlighted by Sandberg and others, that limits leadership roles for women in many fields. Gender bias is deeply institutionalized; women and men conform to stereotyped roles and norm. Harvard lecturer Hannah Riley Bowles says that women who push hard on pay negotiations are perceived more negatively than men who do the same thing. Sandberg has also made this point. When women are in the hiring or promotion process, they are judged on their social skills, while men typically are not.

Thus, likability becomes a key attribute for women who want to get ahead in their careers. However, likability does not drive the type of outcomes sought by academic institutions, journals, school superintendents, college boards, or corporate search committees. The implicit bias that we as a society hold — valuing niceness in women and toughness in men — suggests that women aren’t limited by a glass ceiling, but by a foundation of sand. Women can’t find their footing within attributes they bring to professions without seeming to act out of sync with external expectations.

This embedded bias is woven into the industry fabric even as growing numbers of women enter health care and other fields. In 1965, 6.9% of medical school graduates were women. By 1998, this was up to 36%, and from 2005 on has hovered around 50%. It’s a striking comparison to the 56% of women the World Bank says make up the U.S. workforce. Yet only around 19% of corporate board seats in Fortune 1000 companies are held by women. This workforce and leadership discrepancy persists across many fields in the United States.

Scientific research, unfortunately, has followed suit. A BMJ study of female-first authorship shows that despite women approaching parity in medical school, only a third of research studies give women authors top billing in the most prestigious medical journals. And yet, being first author on a paper in a high-impact journal can make someone’s career.

Health care professionals now need to turn the power of research toward solutions. Identifying our own implicit biases and taking action to ensure we are valuing every colleague for what they individually bring to the table is a good start. We should learn from pockets of excellence outside our own institutions: leadership boards with high percentages of women, other countries with high percentages of elected women officials. We should apply our scientific approach, without judgment, to see how and why those organizations have been able to do what we in health care have not, then embed those changes into our own practices. By studying the small things that make a big difference, we can build a strong foundation for our future — not a foundation of sand.

New Call for Submissions ­to NEJM Catalyst

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

More From Leadership
East London NHS Foundation Trust Non-Clinical Quality Improvement Days Taken to Complete Disciplinary Process

Quality Improvement for Non-Clinical Teams

Administrative QI projects save money, streamline processes, and even improve patient care for the U.K.’s National Health Service.

Physician Clinician Burnout Is Extensive

Leadership Survey: Immunization Against Burnout

Clinician burnout is far from being eliminated at health care organizations, but leaders, frontline physicians, and nurses are joining forces to get to the roots of the crisis.

Fleisher03_pullquote Physicians-in-Training - An Untapped Resource for Health Care Innovation

Physicians-in-Training: An Untapped Resource for Health Care Innovation

Five strategies that can support long-term leadership development and open opportunities for system transformation.

Tait Shanafelt

Beyond Burnout — Redesigning Care to Restore Meaning and Sanity for Physicians

There’s a growing recognition that organizations need to redesign the way that clinical care is delivered to address the national physician burnout epidemic. Measuring rates of physician burnout is the first step.

Sample Testimonials from Fresh Eyes Action Learning Program

Action Learning–Based Leadership Development at an Academic Medical Center

How Mayo Clinic utilized an action learning–based program to foster the leadership skills needed to navigate the changing landscape of health care.

Many Different Definitions of Stakeholder Alignment in a Health Care Organization

Leadership Survey: Why Big Gaps in Organizational Alignment Matter

An NEJM Catalyst Insights Council survey finds that clinicians and leaders do not see eye-to-eye on many aspects of health care delivery.

Physician Coaching Models Interview Large Headshots - Rana Awdish Dale Glenn Ghazala Sharieff Tom Howell Namita Seth Mohta

Physician Coaching Models: Solutions and Impediments

A group of care experience leaders from across the United States discuss innovative physician coaching models at their respective organizations.

University of Utah Family Medicine Residency Program Value Improvement Projects - Practice-Based Learning and Improvement PBLI Milestones Score by Year of Residency

How the University of Utah Prepares Family Medicine Residents to Lead Value Improvement Efforts

A rigorous 3-year program helps physicians focus on improvement through interprofessional collaboration.

Integrating Product Management Education into Health Care - Example of How Curriculum Would Help Physician Tackle Clinical Need in Tandem with Engineer and Business Lead

The Case for Product Management Education in Clinical Training

How can physicians learn to speak the language of innovation and claim a role for themselves within the innovation ecosystem?

Della Lin picture

Lessons in Leadership: Della Lin

How lessons from a concert pianist in timing, audience connection, and intent apply to health care leadership.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Physician Burnout

34 Articles

Leadership Survey: Immunization Against Burnout

Clinician burnout is far from being eliminated at health care organizations, but leaders, frontline physicians,…

Leading Transformation

194 Articles

What If We Treated Mental Health…

How would we react if only 1 out of 10 people with cancer saw a…

Leading Teams

130 Articles

Action Learning–Based Leadership Development at an…

How Mayo Clinic utilized an action learning–based program to foster the leadership skills needed to…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now