Care Redesign

Bundled Payment in the U.S.: The Slow March Is Almost Over

Article · November 25, 2015

Close to 50 years ago, in March 1967, a landmark article described how to change the unit of analysis in medical care from an individual service to a medical episode. It’s a simple concept, after all: Instead of looking at and analyzing a set of seemingly disjointed services, group them into an episode that defines an illness, an injury, or a treatment. In doing so, suggested Jerry Solon, PhD, of the University of Pittsburgh, it is possible to start making real inferences about the inputs (health care services) that generate an output (treating a patient).

Since then, dozens of papers and articles have been written on episodes of care and their incarnation into a payment modality that, today, is referred to as a bundled payment. In fact, a 2012 report from the Congressional Budget Office identified bundled payments as the only Medicare payment demonstration project to date that had showed clear savings. And yet, despite the simple and intuitive nature of Solon’s observations, payments for episodes of medical care remain a rarity in U.S. health care. Let’s try to understand why this is so and how that can and will change.

Slowed by Inertia and Poor Wiring

The first and most obvious impediment to widespread adoption of episodes as the unit of accounting, analysis, and payment is the inherent threat it represents to all those who benefit from fee-for-service payment. Consider that the basis for the health care market’s inertia — the resistance of the incumbents to changing the volume and direction of the money flowing in the current system — is counted in trillions of dollars. Who willingly will forgo their portion?

The second and less obvious reason is the state of the wiring of all health care transactions. Think of it as analogous to the state of telephone or cable wiring: Billions of miles of copper and other wires transport signals to stations, then to satellites, back to land stations, and then through more wires to someone’s home. Ripping out and replacing with a far more efficient wire, such as fiber optic, or replacing all wires with cellular towers, requires a considerable capital investment. Those who made that transition early on acted on faith that consumers would prefer mobile telephony.

In the health care industry, billions of transactions flow daily through very simple “wiring” — the claims systems — that was designed to read in each unit of service and pay it at an agreed-upon rate. This simplistic one-to-one relationship is exactly what Solon decried as preventing clinicians from gaining real insights on patient care. Today, it continues to prevent the large-scale move to bundled payments. It may be surprising that in the middle of the second decade of the 21st century, the U.S. health care industry is being hampered by 20th-century claims systems. But that is the hard truth.

Take, for example, the July 2015 announcement by Medicare to launch a mandatory bundled payment program (Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model) in 75 geographic regions by January 1, 2016. Surely, this seems like the early stage of realizing Solon’s goal. But the program is limited — unnecessarily — by the significant administrative constraints of the vendors who process claims. For example, Medicare insists that all bundles be initiated by hospitals because the claims systems can’t figure out how to start such an episode of care outside a hospital setting. That precludes some of the more efficient providers of joint replacements from participating, thus, significantly limiting the impact of the program.

Such limitations have more profoundly affected efforts to pay for the pro-active management of patients with chronic illness. While Medicare and private sector payers have long understood the potential of bundled payments for managing chronic diseases, the ability to operationally execute a program to harvest that potential is almost non-existent. Medicare, for one, has shelved attempts to launch episode of care-based payments for ambulatory care — sensitive conditions such as diabetes, heart failure, and asthma.

Private Plans and Some States Driving Demand for Episodes of Care

We seem stuck in a quandary, knowing that bundled payments bring value for patients, providers, and payers, yet we are incapable of fully exploiting their potential. Fortunately, solutions are actively being developed in the private sector at the behest of forward-looking health plans. CIGNA, Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, and others are sending out requests for proposals to their claims adjudication vendors, demanding working solutions for refined value-based payment programs. Similarly, the states of Arkansas, New York, Ohio, and Tennessee are forging ahead with wholesale changes in Medicaid payments and emphasizing the importance of episodes of care. These shifts are finally creating the market demand — the business case — for solutions to emerge.

As a result, 21st-century innovation is about to hit the decades-old infrastructure for health care transactions. When that happens, and it will by early 2016, the shift will be swift and catch the incumbents unprepared, much as mobile telephony surprised the landline operators.  Perhaps by the 50th anniversary of Dr. Solon’s paper, the simple vision he laid out will be the reality of the land.

New Call for Submissions ­to NEJM Catalyst

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

More From Care Redesign
Improving Scores Through Human-Centered Design

Designing and Implementing Better Patient Experiences

An ophthalmology provider with facilities in the greater Mexico City area is using Human-Centered Design to improve both the patient and staff experience.

Joseph04_pullquote_hospital_wellness

Designing Hospitals That Heal as Well as Treat

Hospitals must provide wholesome food, sound sleeping conditions, and human connection to promote healing and wellness.

Health Care Organizations Only Occassionally Apply Design Thinking

Care Redesign Survey: How Design Thinking Can Transform Health Care

Health care leaders and frontline clinicians are eager to embrace design thinking. Yet its principles are not widely applied.

Chernew04_pullquote targeted supplemental data collection

Targeted Supplemental Data Collection — Addressing the Quality-Measurement Conundrum

Targeted supplemental data collection may be a valuable approach to balancing data needs with data-collection costs.

Opioid Prescriptions Strength Conversion Table

Tackling the Opioid Crisis with Clear Prescription Guidelines, Accurate Monitoring, and Provider Education

How a large physician organization reduced the amount of opioids prescribed per patient while increasing referrals for pain management consultation.

David Waters Community Servings CEO

Food as Medicine: Meeting the Needs of Complex Medical Diets

How Community Servings evolved from an HIV nutrition program to one that feeds people with any illness.

HaH-Plus Program Reduces Patient Days Spent in Health Care Facilities in Final 180 Days of Life

Hospital at Home–Plus Reduces Days Spent in Hospitals and Other Inpatient Facilities

Patients enrolled in Mount Sinai Health System’s HaH-Plus program spend about one-third as many days in health care facilities as inpatients in the last 180 days of life.

SLUCare General Internal Medicine Interactive Voice Response - Patient Access

Creating a Holistic Approach to Patient Access

To get beyond simplistic measures such as increased patient appointments or decreased lag days, operations administrators and physician champions must develop effective partnerships.

Bridgeport Hospital Senior Staff Safety Rounds - Improving Serious Safety Event Rate

Senior Staff Safety Rounds: A Commitment to Ensure Safety Is the Top Priority

Bridgeport Hospital leaders find that face-to-face feedback from physicians and staff leads to real-time improvements that have positively impacted safety.

Responding to Opioids Epidemic - chronic pain, opioids epidemic data

The Physicians’ Quandary with Opioids: Pain versus Addiction

The national addiction crisis has led to a crackdown on physician prescribing abilities for opioids. Frontline physicians and clinical leaders are torn between wanting to prevent addiction and wanting to treat chronic pain.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Opioids Epidemic

19 Articles

Tackling the Opioid Crisis with Clear…

How a large physician organization reduced the amount of opioids prescribed per patient while increasing…

Social Needs

70 Articles

Moving from a Sickness Model of…

The expense of the U.S. health care system is so misaligned from what we need…

Mental Health

23 Articles

Designing Hospitals That Heal as Well…

Hospitals must provide wholesome food, sound sleeping conditions, and human connection to promote healing and…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now