Leadership

The Adverse Impact of the Physician-Hero

Article · May 24, 2018

For our sickest patients, medical practice has become too complex for one physician to do it all. Mortality rates have fallen for many conditions and there is little doubt that routinization and super-specialization have contributed to improved clinical outcomes. Yet, some of the hardest-working physicians have responded to the demands of complex medicine by redoubling efforts to manage all aspects of care.

These physicians embody what we call heroic value. They feel compelled to make every decision for a patient, not trusting or relying on others in the care process, and have a deeply ingrained sense of personal responsibility. Indeed, these physicians work tirelessly to deliver excellent clinical outcomes. Through relentless personal accountability to high standards, they struggle to deliver these clinical results in the absence of what many would consider to be effective teamwork.

While we are deeply empathetic to the physician-hero’s pursuit of excellence, we submit that this practice pattern — which has carried over from a different era — has an adverse effect on value. This is because the denominator of the value equation — cost — can easily be increased when the physician-hero engages in workarounds at the expense of team-based best practices, thus reducing value, even if the numerator — outcome — remains the same. Clearly, not all patients are ideally suited to standardized care pathways, and innovation by experienced clinicians is necessary to improve outcomes; however, such innovation works best when integrated with team-based care models. Five conditions explain why effective teamwork is required to optimize costs for the delivery of complex care.

First, because the physician-hero controls almost all aspects of care, the cycle time on decisions becomes entirely dependent on that physician’s availability. Consider, for example, a patient on extracorporeal life support who no longer requires the life-saving technology but who waits for 24 hours to separate from the device because the physician who placed the patient on support and who desires to maintain oversight of care is unavailable. In a team-based system, the patient would receive the care needed at the time needed, even if it was provided by another member of the team.

Second, non-team-based health care tends to be laden with redundancies and inefficiencies to make up for the inability of any individual to be available for complex care 24 hours a day. Instead of relying on a team member with complementary skills — for example, an intensivist to coordinate ICU care — decisions are deferred to the individual physician who calls in consultants to manage different organ systems in which he or she may not have expertise. Such referral patterns can reinforce non-evidence-based practices if the preferred consultant defers to the physician’s practices that may not be grounded in clinical science in exchange for continued referrals. This contributes to waste and inefficiency.

Third, the stereotypical physician-hero can be demanding and intolerant of perceived oversight (perhaps in part due to the stress they place upon themselves), and such behavior can prompt significant staff turnover. Staffing changes exact a financial toll in the costs of replacing staff and onboarding them. Hours and hours must be reinvested in learning the nuances of how the physician-hero likes his or her patient cared for.

Invariably, systems that are dependent upon multiple physician-heroes create an environment in which staff cannot learn one standardized management process for a particular condition, but must instead apply the specific process that each physician-hero wants. This variability in managing a similar disease process often extends to requirements for a particular device or drug that the individual physician insists on using. As a result, multiple different devices, materials, and drugs that achieve similar results are stocked by the institution with a resultant increase in cost.

Fourth, in pursuit of the best care for their patients and the ability to provide it in real time, physician-heroes tend to not recognize the effect that their practice pattern has on occupying hospital resources. Take, for example, the cardiologist who does not relinquish his or her procedural time to another cardiologist because of only a potential need, but ultimately does not do a procedure. Another patient who could have received care earlier isn’t able to have the procedure and the institution also incurs the personnel costs associated with staffing that procedure room. Simply said, a team-based ethos that mandates flexibility in interventional room use and reallocates the time based on patient need would improve care and lower cost.

Finally, a system that accedes to the individual physician who does everything cannot capitalize on the collective intelligence that teams bring to care. Even the best physicians are occasionally wrong. Diverse and effective teams are more likely to develop novel solutions to commonly encountered problems that further improve outcomes and lower costs.

The idea that effective teamwork promotes safety and superior clinical outcomes is rational and widely held despite a lack of consistent data linking the two. In contrast, the notion that team-based care models lower health care delivery costs has received less attention, though the data are potentially more robust.

In sum, institutions that maintain the physician-hero model eventually experience fatigue from managing a service line that too frequently appears in crisis. Of course, changing this process takes time and if the financial rewards to the hospital are significant — as they often are with technically skilled physicians — the institution may try various workarounds and patches before concluding that the costs are not worthwhile. Unless the institution has a strong brand, rebuilding a service line may incur a reputational cost, as patients have little insight into the challenges described here and may simply react to the departure of a star performer.

Creating a culture of team-based care requires thoughtful leadership and a shift in focus from who is in charge to how patients’ care needs can be most efficiently met. The foundation of such an approach includes intensive communication and coordination. Senior hospital leadership must message unwavering commitment to these principles for culture change to be effective. Because these skills may not come naturally to the hero physician, he or she may need the assistance of mentoring and coaching programs to adopt practices that are better aligned with contemporary care models.

Health care is changing to focus on delivering high-value care. Cost optimization is a critical piece of this strategy. Like the institutions that they work in, physicians, too, must adopt models for delivering complex care that maintain excellent outcomes and optimize cost. We believe that effective teamwork is an indispensable element for a successful value-based care delivery strategy.

Call for submissions:

Now inviting expert articles, longform articles, and case studies for peer review

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

More From Leadership
The Largest Share of Organizations Do Not Have a Formal Strategy for Clinician Engagement

Leadership Survey: Why Clinicians Are Not Engaged, and What Leaders Must Do About It

Clinician engagement is vital for improving clinical quality and patient satisfaction, as well as the job satisfaction of clinicians themselves. Yet nearly half of health care organizations are not very effective or not at all effective at clinician engagement.

Rowe01_pullquote - clinician well-being - fighting clinician burnout and creating culture of wellness takes all stakeholders

Defending the Term “Burnout”: A Useful Tool in the Quest to Ease Clinician Suffering

Health care leaders must take a preemptive approach to clinician well-being that is supported by all stakeholders and prioritized on an equal footing with essential clinical and financial measures.

Screenshot from the NewYork Quality Care Chronic Condition Dashboard

Success in a Hospital-Integrated Accountable Care Organization

How NewYork Quality Care achieved shared savings — by strengthening collaboration, enhancing care management with telehealth, and transparently sharing performance data.

Miller03_pullquote social determinants whole-person

How a State Advances Whole-Person Health Care

Pennsylvania addresses social determinants of health by bringing together managed care and social services organizations to expand access to vital resources.

Abigail Geisinger Scholars Program for Medical Students -Ryu02_pullquote

Why a Teaching Hospital Offers an Employment-Based Tuition Waiver Program

Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine subsidizes medical students’ education in exchange for their willingness to practice at Geisinger Health System.

Michael Dowling and Charles Kenney headshots

Rebooting Health Care: An Optimistic Outlook

The U.S. health care system may seem broken, but it’s on its way to greatness, according to the authors of Health Care Reboot. They discuss their optimism for U.S. health care reform, particularly on the social determinants of health, payment, consumerism, and technology.

Action Steps for Risk-Share Contracts for Medical Devices

Challenges and Best Practices for Health Systems to Consider When Implementing Risk-Share Contracts for Medical Devices

When done right, value-based contracting for medical devices can ameliorate shrinking margins at health systems, leading to a virtuous circle.

Health Care Organizational Culture Emphasizes Patient Care Only Slightly More Than the Bottom Line

Survey Snapshot: Who Should Lead Culture Change?

NEJM Catalyst Insights Council members feel that culture change at their organizations is heading in the right direction, but differ on who it should come from, and reveal too much balance between emphasis on bottom line and emphasis on patient care.

Culture Change Within Health Care Organizations Is Changing for the Better

Leadership Survey: Organizational Culture Is the Key to Better Health Care

Although three-quarters of Insights Council survey respondents say culture change is a high or moderate priority at their organizations, survey results show a lot of work on organizational culture remains to be done.

Metraux01_pullquote - dinners to combat burnout in the health care community

“Breaking Bread” to Combat Burnout

Can a simple dinner create community among health care providers?

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Leading Teams

169 Articles

Leadership Survey: Why Clinicians Are Not…

Clinician engagement is vital for improving clinical quality and patient satisfaction, as well as the…

Team Care

109 Articles

Leadership Survey: Why Clinicians Are Not…

Clinician engagement is vital for improving clinical quality and patient satisfaction, as well as the…

Rating the Raters: An Evaluation of…

Some promising innovation is taking place among organizations that rate hospital performance, but major systemic…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now