Patient Engagement
Talk
Value-Based Insurance Design: Theory vs. Practice (04:23)

Compelling literature backs up the idea of basing co-payments on the clinical value of a service. However, broader adoption of this strategy is complicated by several barriers, according to Niteesh Choudhry, Executive Director of the Center for Healthcare Delivery Sciences at Brigham and Women’s Hospital.

The first is figuring out which services to apply this concept to and the basic details of their design. Value-based insurance design has thus far been almost exclusively applied to drugs, but there are a number of other services to consider for cost sharing, such as non-drug therapeutics.

“Perhaps the greatest benefit or potential benefit of this idea of basing co-payments on value would be achieved by raising co-payments for those things that are of low value,” says Choudhry. “If we’re really going to drive economic value, that’s where it would come [from].”

“Equally important when it comes to applying value-based insurance design in practice is that we need to really be thoughtful about how we do it,” adds Choudhry. “So if you’ve seen one value-based insurance program you’ve seen exactly one value-based insurance program.”

Second, because most health care in the U.S. is employer sponsored, insurance is often fragmented: employees change employers frequently, and employers change insurers frequently. Employers and insurers may therefore be reluctant to adopt value-based insurance strategies. “We need to think thoughtfully about how to create incentives for employers to actually do this in the short run,” says Choudhry.

Lastly, Choudhry says, we need to do a better job of targeting who we use this strategy for. Much of the improvement in adherence resulting from these strategies has come from patients who had already been adherent. “There are small improvements in adherence for the population as a whole and many patients who did not actually respond at all,” notes Choudhry. “So as we move forward for this quality improvement intervention or any of the wide varieties in benefit design or broader into technology, we need to do a much better job of making this trade-off.”

From the NEJM Catalyst event Patient Engagement: Behavioral Strategies for Better Health at the University of Pennsylvania, February 25, 2016. Watch Part 1 of Niteesh Choudhry’s talk: An Alternative Approach to Insurance Design.

More From Patient Engagement

Shared Decision-Making for Good Clinical Care: Better, but Not Easier

Active patient involvement and patient autonomy can be burdensome to patients, especially when they are faced with serious illness. The primary goal of shared decision-making is not autonomy, but good care that fits patients’ lives.

The Patient as Consumer and the Measurement of Bedside Manner

Many physicians do not believe patient satisfaction is a legitimate pursuit. Yet they must meet consumers of health care where they are — on Internet ratings sites.

Health Care — A Final Frontier for Design

Design must move beyond narrow projects and encompass complex systems.

Halpern02_clip_still: A/B Testing Health Behavior Interventions

A/B Testing Health Behavior

Health care can’t implement changes overnight like Silicon Valley, but we can still learn from their version of treatment and control.

Social Interventions Can Lower Costs and Improve Outcomes

We can better serve our under-resourced patients by helping them access treatments and social interventions we already know to be effective.

Better Communication Makes Better Physicians

How Adrienne Boissy and Cleveland Clinic are focusing on physician communication — and getting results.

Why Real-World Results Are So Challenging for Digital Health

User engagement outside of clinical trials is the critical factor.

Transparency and Trust — Online Patient Reviews of Physicians

Transparency of validated data about delivery-system performance has the power to change the culture of health care.

Patient Engagement Survey: Technology Tools Gain Support — But Cost Is a Hurdle

NEJM Catalyst Insights Council members say patient engagement technology tools must be patient-centric and are most useful for managing chronic disease.

Patient-Researchers and Physician-Consultants Confront Chronic Disease

Personal-use sensors and data applications allow patients with Type 1 diabetes and other chronic diseases to take charge of managing their health. This is the future of chronic disease management.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Patient Incentives

43 Articles

A/B Testing Health Behavior

Health care can’t implement changes overnight like Silicon Valley, but we can still learn from…

Patient-Centered Care

138 Articles

Shared Decision-Making for Good Clinical Care:…

Active patient involvement and patient autonomy can be burdensome to patients, especially when they are…

Patients As Customers

64 Articles

Shared Decision-Making for Good Clinical Care:…

Active patient involvement and patient autonomy can be burdensome to patients, especially when they are…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now