Patient Engagement
Clip
Can—and Should—Benefit Design Be Standardized? (05:10)

We need to push for simpler, more thoughtfully crafted value-based benefit designs, says NEJM Catalyst Lead Advisor Thomas Lee. But should those designs also be standardized?

“Having designs that people can actually understand, that don’t get in the way of them making good decisions, is a great idea,” says Katherine Baicker. “But I would love to see insurance plan innovation in having different designs that are actually well geared to the population they’re trying to serve.” She describes, for example, an insurance plan geared toward diabetics.

There’s also a role for nuanced financial incentives, Baicker says. But, she cautions, they have to be “encased within a plan that is for human beings and that promotes good health behaviors.” For example, if a plan that charges higher copayments for emergency department use — to discourage people from using EDs for non-emergency situations — is complicated, that’s neither good for patient care nor cost effective, because emergencies can’t be predicted ahead of time. But if the plan is designed to make visiting a primary care doctor less expensive than going to the ED, and the doctor has convenient hours, that can be beneficial.

Niteesh Choudhry agrees. “There’s a distinction between simple, of which I’m a huge fan, and still clinically appropriate or clinically nuanced,” he says. Value-based insurance design is about offering “the right services to the right patient at the right time,” and it is structured to place more value on clinical outcomes than on cost.

Choudhry also notes that insurance design and social incentives are only partial solutions. “They’re the way that insurers can do things or the way that employers can do things,” he says, “but they’re not exclusive.”

“I think we’ve been asking over the past couple of years for our insurance benefit design to do far more of the heavy lifting than it really is capable of doing,” adds David Asch. “There are so many other elements of our health care system that can carry some of the weight there and really will have to.”

From the NEJM Catalyst event Patient Engagement: Behavioral Strategies for Better Health at the University of Pennsylvania, February 25, 2016.

More From Patient Engagement

Better Communication Makes Better Physicians

How Adrienne Boissy and Cleveland Clinic are focusing on physician communication — and getting results.

Why Real-World Results Are So Challenging for Digital Health

User engagement outside of clinical trials is the critical factor.

Transparency and Trust — Online Patient Reviews of Physicians

Transparency of validated data about delivery-system performance has the power to change the culture of health care.

Patient Engagement Survey: Technology Tools Gain Support — But Cost Is a Hurdle

NEJM Catalyst Insights Council members say patient engagement technology tools must be patient-centric and are most useful for managing chronic disease.

Patient-Researchers and Physician-Consultants Confront Chronic Disease

Personal-use sensors and data applications allow patients with Type 1 diabetes and other chronic diseases to take charge of managing their health. This is the future of chronic disease management.

Survey Snapshot: What Patient Engagement Technology Is Good For

NEJM Catalyst Insights Council members weigh in on the top benefits of medical apps and other tools, and on the barriers to adoption, including unclear impact on patient outcomes.

Geisinger’s Refund Promise: Where Things Stand After One Year

Geisinger’s radical refund promise at one year — no evidence of financial catastrophe but a good return on patient trust.

Engineering Social Incentives for Health

It’s important to engineer social engagements that promote health, but we must also test their acceptability and effectiveness.

My Favorite Slide: One Size Does Not Fit All in Behavioral Interventions

Behavioral interventions can have very different effects in different portions of the population.

Adding Value by Talking More

Talk is cheap, but it’s also effective, especially when it comes to better patient care.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

P4 Medicine and the Democratization of…

“P4 health care” — predictive, preventive, personalized, and participatory — will use the astonishing power…

Patient-Centered Care

134 Articles

Better Communication Makes Better Physicians

How Adrienne Boissy and Cleveland Clinic are focusing on physician communication — and getting results.

Social Needs

34 Articles

What Happens When We Can’t Cope…

Do we give patients more work, more choice, or both?

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now