Care Redesign 2016

Insights in Detail: What’s Standing in the Way of Care Redesign?

Insights Report · June 1, 2016

We talked to executives, clinical leaders, and clinician members of our Insights Council for a closer look at the major obstacles preventing increased value in care.

 

Understanding the top barriers to improving the value of health care is critical to the transformation of health care delivery. Without clarity about what is standing in the way of value-based care, health care leaders and practitioners will be unable to move forward with clinical practice initiatives and other opportunities outlined in Care Redesign Report: Why Population Health Management is Undervalued.

The top obstacle identified in NEJM Catalyst research to improving the value of care was the fee-for-service payment system, according to 52% of respondents overall, as well as 59% of executives and 63% of clinical leaders participating in the survey. Thomas Yackel, MD, MPH, MS, FACP, CPE, Vice President and Chief Clinical Integration Officer at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, says that fee-for-service creates a misalignment across health care. “The moral imperative for physicians is to be conservative with the application of health care, while the business imperative is to always do more.” Value-based care, he says, will solve this disparity.

Joel Reich, MD, FACEP, MMM, Senior Vice President for Medical Affairs and Chief Medical Officer at Eastern Connecticut Health Network in Manchester, points out that the fee-for-service system doesn’t align incentives with better long-term health, coordination of care, or managing the social determinants of health. “Fee-for-service says, ‘I did this, so I get paid for this,’” he says. “There is nothing in it financially that would push people to work in a more unified manner.”

He believes reimbursement that is directly tied to care quality, outcomes, and management of the total cost of care will enable alignment of care providers.

Providers should be incentivized to change how they deliver care, he says. In a value-based world, integrated networks would promote healthy eating and activity, use community care managers and home health extensively, and be more likely to take advantage of telehealth, including remote patient monitoring and telepsychiatry, to integrate behavioral health services. “Instead of selling health services, we would truly deliver health,” he says.

Respondents to the NEJM Catalyst survey differed in their perception of the patient role in health care. More than half of clinicians (52%) ranked “lack of patient engagement in improving their own health” as their choice for top barrier. Overall, respondents ranked this as the second greatest obstacle to improving the value of care.

Titus Abraham, MD, an internist at Annapolis (Maryland) Internal Medicine, and the physician manager for the practice, says that while he believes lack of patient engagement is a significant issue, he calls it “a two-way street.” “The role of the doctor has diminished,” he says. “Patients are seeking care from other sources such as the Internet, television programming, and so-called ‘alternative providers.’” Abraham believes the onus is on physicians to be more assertive in finding out why a patient is going elsewhere for care.

“Primary care providers, if adequately knowledgeable themselves, can provide the needed context for information and can provide the needed healthy skepticism and evidence-based thinking to determine the role and value of testing and treatment,” he says.

For instance, when he found out a patient of his who had suffered panic attacks had been consulting other doctors and was scheduled for a coronary catheterization, he asked the patient and his wife to see him first. Abraham recommended the patient see a psychiatrist before the procedure. The patient was later diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder rather than cardiac disease.

The third-greatest barrier to improving the value of care, named by 41% of respondents to the NEJM Catalyst survey, was lack of integration of different types of facilities (such as tertiary and community hospitals and non-acute care). Terrill Theman, MD, Adjunct Professor of Healthcare Systems Engineering at Lehigh University, and a former practicing cardiothoracic surgeon, believes that a lack of accountability has hindered care coordination. “When I was in practice, since I was getting the majority of the fee associated with the illness, I made it my job to integrate that patient’s care and get sign-off from all members of their care team,” Theman says. He experienced a fractured delivery system that left patients feeling like no one took responsibility for them. “They need someone who is captain of the ship to make sure everyone talks to one another and that there is a reasonable treatment plan.”

Theman says value-based care makes him optimistic about the future of care delivery, though the rollout has not been perfect. “At least the Affordable Care Act shook the pot and got us working on solutions.”

Care Redesign Insights Report Chart: Barriers to Improving Value of Care

From the Care Redesign Insights Report: Why Population Health Management Is Undervalued. Click To Enlarge.

New Call for Submissions ­to NEJM Catalyst

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

More From Care Redesign 2016

Poor Care Is the Root of Physician Disengagement

When physicians and health care executives disagree over the purpose of medicine, disengagement is the inevitable result.

Population Health: The Ghost Aim

We are finally at a moment in the history of health care when we know what to do to achieve better health, who should do it, and how to get it done.

Health Reform and the Changing Safety Net in the United States

How the coverage provisions of the ACA are affecting safety-net health systems, responses of these systems to payment reform, and future directions in scaling up improvements and innovation in delivery systems.

The MACRA Final Rule: Five Crucial Questions Asked and Answered

MACRA could be bigger than Obamacare for physicians, yet many “barely know anything about it.”

Rethinking the Primary Care Workforce — An Expanded Role for Nurses

In the primary care practice of the future, the physician’s role will increasingly be played by nurse practitioners.

Survey Snapshot: How to Achieve Post-Acute Care Coordination

Commentary from NEJM Catalyst Insights Council members on preferred post-acute networks and the importance of communication.

Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

PROMs pioneer shares what’s working in a large health system.

A Memo to the Brilliant

Top-down regulation of physicians may have been a factor in Democrats’ defeat. Blind commitment to specific models of payment reform has put much into jeopardy, unnecessarily.

Care Redesign Survey: Strengthening the Post-Acute Care Connection

Ties between health systems and post-acute care facilities are on the rise, but much work remains to truly coordinate care.

The Hard Work of Health Care Transformation

Experience shows that although a changed market may be a helpful precondition to local performance improvement, it hardly guarantees effective operational change.

Connect

A weekly email newsletter featuring the latest actionable ideas and practical innovations from NEJM Catalyst.

Learn More »

Topics

Protecting the Tired, the Poor, the…

After President Trump’s executive order banning refugees, the United States is no longer a bright…

Coordinated Care

85 Articles

Focusing on High-Cost Patients — The…

A focus on high-cost patients may not only fail to contain health care spending, but…

Primary Care

101 Articles

Changing How We Pay for Primary…

Primary care accounts for more than half of the United States’ office visits, but direct…

Insights Council

Have a voice. Join other health care leaders effecting change, shaping tomorrow.

Apply Now